Re: [technology-pmc] Request from Koneki LDT to join Juno release train

[Benjamin Cabé <bcabe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for the clarification Wayne.

The three new (6240, 6241, 6242) would need to be approved for Juno indeed.

Regarding the remaining four:

• 5278 is NOT needed for Juno
• 5275 and 5575 ARE needed.
• 5276 could virtually be withdrawn, since 6240 is requesting the inclusion of a newer version of the Metalua library. 5276 already passed preliminary review, though, and I have detailed in 6240 with as much detailed possible the delta between the version in 5276, and the one in 6240 that we would need for Juno.

Thanks,

Benjamin

________________________________________________________________________

De : Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Répondre à : Technology PMC <technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date : Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:04:42 -0800
À : "technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx" <technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Objet : Re: [technology-pmc] Request from Koneki LDT to join Juno release train

Strictly speaking, the CQs need to be identified as being required for Juno by Feb 8. But since they're already in the system, we may have some wiggle room.

I see the three new CQs; can I assume that the remaining four currently unapproved CQs must also be approved for Juno?

Wayne