Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [technology-pmc] Request from Koneki LDT to join Juno release train

Sorry for the delay.

The project looks generally good. I did find a few major things that I'd like you to address (see below).

I am in favour of Koneki joining the release train (i.e. +1). But we'll have to move quickly. Note that the CQ submission deadline has passed, so no additional third-party libraries can be added until post-Juno.

I can't find a CQ for org.apache.xerces_2.9.0.*.jar. Do you know how that wound up in the project downloads [1]?

I think that the patch on Bug 369759 [2] needs to be flagged as iplog+ (more help here [3]).

You need to specify at least one release in the project metadata [4]; note that project plans are version specific and that you should include a link to the version-specific plan with the release information.

I'd like to see increased project diversity, but that's something that comes with time. Having the project on the release train will help in that regard. What sorts of things is the project doing to increase diversity and grow community?

The code base looks pretty mature. When do you intend to graduate?

Are members from the project participating in the cross-project mailing list?

Thanks,

Wayne

[1]http://www.eclipse.org/projects/tools/downloads.php?id=technology.koneki
[2] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=369759
[3] http://www.eclipse.org/projects/tools/ip_contribution_review.php?id=technology.koneki
[4] http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Project_Meta-Data

On 02/14/2012 01:06 PM, Benjamin Cabé wrote:
Dear PMC,

I know this is pretty late in the game, but I would like to request for the Lua Development Tools (a sub-component of Koneki) to be able to join the Juno train.
We already produce signed builds and a p2 repo, our IP log is accurate, our project plan is ready… Building LDT against latest Juno milestones produces stable builds, that we have successfully smoke-tested.

The project is getting a lot of interest these days (we have 1200+ downloads of the tool already, including the installation made by the MPC), and we believe being on the train would be a great opportunity for the project to reach a broader community.

Let me know if that works for you (if it does, I guess this should be agreed by the Planning Council too), and feel free to ask should you need more information.

Thanks,
Benjamin –
_______________________________________________ technology-pmc mailing list technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc

--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
EclipseCon
          2012AGILEALM
          2012

Back to the top