Paul,
Those bugs don't appear to have any patches or code attached to
them. The expectation is that Iain's contributions are documented
through the bugs in the form of code, not just as bug reports that
he entered. You can then indicate in the bugs that you reviewed and
committed the code he attached.
When that's done, I think you'll need to start the nomination over
again because his original nomination was vetoed by the PMC.
Eric
On 9/6/11 1:25 PM, Paul Trevithick wrote:
Eric,
In the past month Iain has contributed code and/or fixes
related to the following bugs:
I committed the code and all of the
above are now fixed/closed.
How should we proceed there to
resurrect the committer election process for Iain?
Paul
On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:11 PM, Eric Rizzo wrote:
Excellent. Thanks for understanding the need for
transparency and openness.
Eric
On 8/8/11 12:06 PM, Paul Trevithick wrote:
I've been committing code that he
hands me (we both work for Azigo.com).
Iain has agreed to do this more
transparently for a month. We'll create some bugzilla
entries and he'll attached the code to them, and then
I'll review and commit them in. That way we'll create
the proper public record.
Paul
On Aug 8, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Eric
Rizzo wrote:
How has he been contributing
code? Is there some other public record of his
contributions besides Eclipse Bugzilla?
Just for reference, here's the
policy statement: http://wiki.eclipse.org/Technology#Committer_Elections
Eric
On 8/4/11 2:26 PM, Paul
Trevithick wrote:
Eric,
We can ask Iain to start
submitting patches to Bugzilla and after say a month
of him doing that perhaps I can re-nominate him.
Does that make sense as a process? Or is there some
other way to do this?
Paul
On Aug 4, 2011, at 9:03 AM,
Eric Rizzo wrote:
Paul,
Nominations are expected to
include direct references to code contributions or
other concrete evidence of the nominee's history
of contribution. Usually that includes Bugzilla
links that include accepted patches by the
nominee.
This is not intended to
question or doubt Iain's worthiness, but rather to
uphold our standards and transparency.
Eric
On 8/3/11 12:01 AM, portal
on behalf of emo wrote:
technology PMC Members,
This automatically
generated message marks the completion of voting
for
Iain MacNeill's Committer
status on the technology.higgins project. As a
PMC member, you can
approve or disapprove this vote through your My
Foundation portal page:
http://portal.eclipse.org/
Iain MacNeill was
nominated by Paul Trevithick as follows:
Iain has over 12 years of
software development experience mostly building
front-end web
applications. Lately he has been actively
contributing new
code and enhancements to
the Higgins 2.0 codebase. Most recently he's
worked on creating the
"portal" front-end logic including the context
editor, integration with
the HBX plugin.
Vote summary: 4/0/0 with
11 not voting
? Paula Austel
? Duane Buss
? Anthony Bussani
? Greg Byrd
? Thomas Gross
? Valery Kokhan
? Vitaliy Lakhno
? Tie Li
+1 Sergey Lyakhov
? Michael McIntosh
+1 Mary Ruddy
? Markus Sabadello
? Jim Sermersheim
+1 George Stanchev
+1 Paul Trevithick
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing
list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
|