| Re: [technology-pmc] Asking for Approval of Jubula 1.0.0 Graduation/Release review |
Hi all, I've written up a first draft of a release doc. Have a look at http://www.eclipse.org/jubula/project-info/ReleaseDocs_1_0_0.html What's missing in the draft is information about the Bugzilla usage which is our main way to make development issues transparent. If you have a look you will notice the we use Bugzilla to document our code changes and decisions. Please feel free to ask questions on topics which are not clear. Regards Achim On 10.05.2011, at 16:59, Chris Aniszczyk wrote: > 2011/5/10 Achim Lörke <Achim.Loerke@xxxxxxxxx>: >> I'm quite sure we've done everything necessary but please tell me if >> anything is missing. > > Before I vote, can you describe how you meet some of the needs listed here: > http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Criteria_for_Graduating_from_Incubation_Phase_to_Mature_Phase > > I know Jubula came from a mature code base, I'm just concerned how > quickly it graduated to 1.0 without fulfilling some of the things a > graduated eclipse.org project should do in regards to building a > community, being transparent, etc... > > So when you have the graduation review slides ready, it would be great > to see what's there. > > -- > Cheers, > > Chris Aniszczyk > http://aniszczyk.org > +1 512 961 6719 > _______________________________________________ > technology-pmc mailing list > technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature