Re: [technology-pmc] CQs for re-using Eclipse projects

[Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Oh you're involved now.

Frankly, I find this case a little weird; I am hopeful that it will make 
more sense in time.

If an Eclipse project completely reuses another *mature* Eclipse 
project, then no CQ is required.

If an Ecilpse project uses part of another Eclipse project (or 
completely reuses an incubating Eclipse Project), then a CQ is required.

So... in this case, the CQ is required.

AFAICT this one should be simple. I recommend that we +1-it and move on.

Wayne

Jeff McAffer wrote:
> I'm not looking to get involved here but I believe that reusing part of an Eclipse project requires a CQ.
>
> Jeff
>
> On 2010-06-07, at 3:21 PM, Gunnar Wagenknecht wrote:
>
>   
> > Am 07.06.2010 16:20, schrieb yves.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx:
> >     
> > > Please note that it is not a simple reuse like the dependance of bundles.
> > > It is about the copy and redistribution of some codes.
> > >       
> > This shouldn't matter. We have a bunch of internal utility classes which
> > were copied/duplicated between different projects.
> >
> > -Gunnar
> >
> > --
> > Gunnar Wagenknecht
> > gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://wagenknecht.org/
> > _______________________________________________
> > technology-pmc mailing list
> > technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
> >     
>
> _______________________________________________
> technology-pmc mailing list
> technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
>   

--
Wayne Beaton, The Eclipse Foundation
http://www.eclipse.org