[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [technology-pmc] All the IAM CQs
|
Wayne, I am aware of that decision, however as you already noticed you underestimated number of dependencies and I am also pretty sure you also underestimated amount of changes that is going to happen in the Maven code and the structure of its dependencies.
I think the lesson from this exercise is that IAM team should work closer to the Maven developers. Otherwise they are bound to continue making such mistakes and will continue generating unnecessary load on the PMC and Eclipse legal team.
regards,
Eugene
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Wayne Beaton
<wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Abel, the IP team, and I discussed this over several weeks and have decided that this is the best way for the project to proceed. Of course, we didn't realize that there'd be 40 bajillion CQs, but maybe we should have asked that question...
FWIW, the backlog with IP DD is such that these CQs will not get a full review for some time.
Wayne
Eugene Kuleshov wrote:
Abel,
Number of those dependencies will either change or go away all together,
so it is premature to process them for any IP issues, because it will cause
unnecessary overhead to PMC and the legal team.
regards,
Eugene
