[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
[technology-pmc] Re: ComponentBee proposal
|
M. Henttonen,
ComponentBee sounds interesting, but there is a key section missing from
the proposal: the Scope section. The Scope section of the proposal
defines the space the project will be working in. Think of the space of
all possible software technology as a map on a flat plane: the scope
section defines the polygon in that space wherein this project (the
ComponentBee project) will work. Our goal at Eclipse is to ensure that
our released projects have non-overlapping scopes thus you can see why
the scope section is an important piece of the proposal process. A
paragraph or two is just fine, but it needs to say what is in scope and
what is out of scope. For example, I assume that out of scope is adding
probes into the SUT (because you use TPTP to do that) and I assume that
in scope is calculating the reliability/quality values for the SUT based
on dynamic traces (because that's one of the key goals of the software).
Etc.
Thanks,
Bjorn
Anne Jacko wrote:
Bjorn, Mike (cc Tech PMC and Katja),
Please review and comment on the ComponentBee proposal:
http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/componentbee/
Thanks.
Anne Jacko
emo@xxxxxxxxxxx