Re: [technology-pmc] ORMF Project plan update

[Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for the update.

Wayne

Joel Rosi-Schwartz wrote:
> Hi.
>
> We have updated the ORMF project plan with new dates: I1 is now longer by 6 
> weeks and I2 is longer by 2 weeks.
>
> There a couple of reasons why we have slipped so miserably:
>
>         * We are finding it very difficult reaching a point of stability that
>           enables the ORMF team to contribute meaningfully.
>         * Our biggest challenge to date is the effort it takes to manage the
>           team. It is still taking more time and efforts input than benefits gained.
>         * The learning curve on the technologies we are adopting, notably EMF
>           and OSGi, are substantial. It is taking longer than anticipated.
>         * We believe that is very important that the ORMF model should be
>           sufficiently flexible to support existing requirements standards.
>           Towards this end enrolled domain experts in the field to assist
>           in cataloguing the essentials with which we can validate the model.
>           This effort started well, but has stalled. Given the holidays, it will
>           be impractical to gather the required information until the new year.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Joel
>
> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Thank you.
>
> http://www.etish.org                                                            
>          http://www.eclipse.org/ormf
>
>
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> technology-pmc mailing list
> technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
>