Re: [technology-pmc] Do we need two mailing lists?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [technology-pmc] Do we need two mailing lists?

From: Gunnar Wagenknecht <gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 07:50:37 +0200
Delivered-to: technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/technology-pmc>
List-help: <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc>, <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc>, <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Openpgp: id=0745A1E3
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)

Wayne Beaton schrieb:
> I'd like to propose that we split the list.

-1.

IMHO it's totally unnecessary. It's a trivial task these days to setup
filters in an regular email client. We should instead use tags in the
subject to identify mails related to a project. For example, we can
prefix project specific messages with "[<projectshortname>]".

-Gunnar

-- 
Gunnar Wagenknecht
gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://wagenknecht.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [technology-pmc] Do we need two mailing lists?
  - From: David Whiteman

References:
- [technology-pmc] Do we need two mailing lists?
  - From: Wayne Beaton

Prev by Date: Re: [technology-pmc] Do we need two mailing lists?
Next by Date: Re: [technology-pmc] Do we need two mailing lists?
Previous by thread: Re: [technology-pmc] Do we need two mailing lists?
Next by thread: Re: [technology-pmc] Do we need two mailing lists?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs