Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [technology-pmc] Do we need two mailing lists?

Sometimes yes, but the Technology PMC != All Committers, so there are (lately) often announcements that the Technology PMC wants to send to it's own projects but not to be sent to all Committers.

Eugene Kuleshov wrote:

 Wouldn't it work to use committers mailing list for such announcements?

 regards,
 Eugene


Bjorn Freeman-Benson wrote:
I'm a +1 on two lists: one for the PMC to have conversations, another for the PMC to announce things to its constituent projects. The project leads are not part of the (now active, yay, thanks Wayne!) PMC in-group. They don't want to be: they have their own in-groups. So it is (as Denis explained) unrealistic to expect the projects to listen to our chatter.  At the same time, we want to have a way to talk to all the projects under our wing without having to go to each list individually. Hence the second list.

Denis Roy wrote:
I'm the one who brought this up.

I recently subscribed to this list because my PMC said it would be good to do so... However, this list is quite chatty, and there's not much here that is of any value to my duties as a project lead.
-- 

[end of message]

------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
 

_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc

--

[end of message]


Back to the top