Re: [swtbot-dev] SWTbot Recorder

[Radhouan BEN BAHRI <radhouan.ben-bahri@xxxxxx>]

It does answer partially my question  cause the necessity of waiting comes when you create a matcher to test a result and the result is not yet displayed in the console for example   .That’s what I did by creating a new shell  and waiting until it closes.
Thank you Michael

 

From: swtbot-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:swtbot-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mickael Istria
Sent: mercredi 10 juillet 2013 11:51
To: swtbot-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [swtbot-dev] SWTbot Recorder

 

I would like to ask again  if exists a solution, other then I mentioned, to force the action to wait until the previous job is done ?

Widget finders already include a wait action to wait for the expected widget to appear, so in many case the wait is implicit and you don't have to care.
In case you have to implement a smarter wait, recorder can't guess it for you, so you have to deal with it by modifying manually generated source code.

I hope this answers your question.

--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat
My blog - My Tweets