Re: [swtbot-dev] Version numbering and git.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [swtbot-dev] Version numbering and git.

From: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 03:10:26 -0500
Delivered-to: swtbot-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ldhQwQw9tXXU7LS81QmH7OUK6p3Z5I38D5RAiYhXxJj8jwFjfQ0E7MdoHAzLvnEHyx mrTANDo/LZX/Rlwzu7rE2vnHQ0+MZ/pEej4QnkGxWeE7H9EQRWNp8LWlBWoFx2EUtlb6 3dD8f2Cr+VxNrGsnWemW7k7/TmOGv79ISz5Io=
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/swtbot-dev>
List-help: <mailto:swtbot-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/swtbot-dev>, <mailto:swtbot-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/swtbot-dev>, <mailto:swtbot-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Ketan Padegaonkar
<ketanpadegaonkar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I can think of bumping the micro component of the version to make the
>> version number 2.0.1.TIMESTAMP to get around this issue. Any other ideas ?

That's completely fine and the simplest solution imho. It's valid also.

-- 
Cheers,

Chris Aniszczyk
http://aniszczyk.org
+1 860 839 2465

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [swtbot-dev] Version numbering and git.
  - From: Mariot Chauvin

References:
- [swtbot-dev] Version numbering and git.
  - From: Ketan Padegaonkar
- Re: [swtbot-dev] Version numbering and git.
  - From: Ketan Padegaonkar

Prev by Date: Re: [swtbot-dev] Version numbering and git.
Next by Date: Re: [swtbot-dev] Version numbering and git.
Previous by thread: Re: [swtbot-dev] Version numbering and git.
Next by thread: Re: [swtbot-dev] Version numbering and git.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs