Re: [swordfish-dev] Screen of SR List

[thorsten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

+1

I do not know, whether anybody cares for my opinion. Just to let you know, that I am still alive ...

CU
Thorsten

----- Original Message -----
From: Zsolt Beothy-Elo
Date: Friday, September 4, 2009 15:38
Subject: Re: [swordfish-dev] Screen of SR List
To: Swordfish Developer Discussions

> +1
> Am 04.09.2009 um 15:18 schrieb Elena Tatarintseva:
>
> > Hi All!
> >
> > Please look at the picture in attachment.
> > Is it ok Service Registry List view?
> >
> > Lena.
> > ________________________________________
> > From: swordfish-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [swordfish-dev-
> > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oliver Wolf
> [oliver.wolf@xxxxxxxxx]> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 4:55 PM
> > To: Swordfish Developer Discussions
> > Subject: [swordfish-dev] Alternatives for WSDL selection from
> registry>
> > Fellow Swordfishers,
> >
> > as discussed before, I see two ways to improve usability of
> the
> > ³select WSDL
> > from registry² interface.
> >
> > Alternative 1 (minimal effort):
> > -------------------------------
> >
> > Leave everything as it is, but add a text message describing
> the
> > current
> > state of the registry (see mockup Alternative1.png).
> >
> > The text message to be displayed depends on the following
> conditions:>
> > 1. If no registry URL has been entered in the Swordfish preferences:
> >
> > "Please setup a registry URL in Preferences->Swordfish->Registry."
> >
> > 2. If a registry URL has been entered, but communication failed:
> >
> > "The Service Registry is unavailable. Please check the URL in
> > Preferences->Swordfish->Registry and make sure that the
> Service
> > Registry is
> > running."
> >
> > 3. If the Service Registry returns an empty list of registered
>
> > services:
> >
> > "The Service Registry does not contain any entries."
> >
> >
> > However, showing the registry entries directly on the wizard
> pane is
> > not a
> > good idea, IMHO. If the list is long the small size of the
> selection
> > box
> > makes it cumbersome to use and handling communication errors
> is
> > problematic.
> > This leads me to
> >
> >
> > Alternative 2:
> > --------------
> >
> > Analogous to selecting a WSDL from the file system, I suggest
> that
> > we just
> > add a "Browse..." button and pop up a new dialog that presents
> the
> > registry
> > entries. If the registry does not contain any entries, the
> list is
> > empty. If
> > communication fails, an error dialog is shown instead of the
> selection> deialog. If no registry URL has been entered, the
> "Service registry"
> > radio
> > button is inactive. (see mockup Alternative2.png)
> >
> > Any comments?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Oliver
>
> _______________________________________________
> swordfish-dev mailing list
> swordfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/swordfish-dev
> 

________________________________________
Thorsten Reimers
SoftQuadrat GmbH, Egmating
Handelsregister des Amtsgericht München, HRB 154007
Geschäftsführer: Thilo Reimers, Thorsten Reimers
www.softquadrat.de
Mobile: 0177 / 3265157
Fax: 03222 / 12 76 014