[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [swordfish-dev] Integrating / evaluating servicemix
|
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Wolf wrote:
And to fully answer your question, Scott, ActiveMQ is not covered by
the CQs we’ve filed for Servicemix.
Are there plans to submit ActiveMQ (or some JMS provider) for CQs? Short
of that, would there be interest in us (ECF) doing so?..and perhaps both
groups could support 'Orbitization' of ActiveMQ (which I am loath to
take on myself, just because of the likely maintenance needs there).
Scott
Oliver
Am 02.07.09 19:16 schrieb "Guillaume Nodet" unter <gnodet@xxxxxxxxx>:
FWIW, ServiceMix does not depend on ActiveMQ, though it nicely
integrate with ...
The previous ServiceMix version (3.x) had some features which were
dependant on ActiveMQ, but those features were optional anyway.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 19:04, Scott
Lewis<slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello Swordfishers,
>
> I'm Scott Lewis, the project lead for ECF
http://www.eclipse.org/ecf. As
> you may have noticed, ECF is doing quite a lot with distributed
OSGi these
> days (e.g. http://www.eclipse.org/ecf/NewAndNoteworthy.html),
<http://www.eclipse.org/ecf/NewAndNoteworthy.html%29,> and we have
> plans to do much more along these lines.
>
> We have a provider architecture, that allows various underlying
messaging
> frameworks to be used to provide discovery, distribution,
messaging, and
> remoting (e.g. see
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Distributed_OSGi_Services_with_ECF).
<http://wiki.eclipse.org/Distributed_OSGi_Services_with_ECF%29.>
> We also have a provider based upon ActiveMQ 5.2.0 that is
currently *not*
> hosted at eclipse.org...primarily because we have not yet
submitted/had
> approved CQs for ActiveMQ 5.2.0, JMS spec (of appropriate
version), and all
> dependencies for ActiveMQ. But this provider is working and
available via
> our CVS server at the OSU Open Source Lab.
>
> This brings me to my question to you: I've noticed the recent
submission of
> CQs for servicemix for Swordfish, and have read that servicemix
depends upon
> ActiveMQ, but would like clarification from you: what is the
relationship
> (in CQ terms) between ActiveMQ and servicemix? That is: is there
already
> approved CQs for ActiveMQ 5.2? If not, will the servicemix CQs you've
> submitted imply separate/additional CQs for ActiveMQ itself? As
we would
> like to *only* use ActiveMQ in ECF (and not the other parts of
servicemix),
> if we need to submit CQs for ActiveMQ separately we will...but we
would
> obviously ride on existing/approved CQs if we can...or submit new
CQs in
> cooperation with you and/or other projects that could benefit from
> availability of ActiveMQ (e.g. via the Orbit project).
>
> Thanksinadvance for any info,
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> Chris Jölly wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>>
>> I have some questions regarding the efforts needed to integrate
swordfish
>>
>> into an application and how much time is needed to get the first
results
>>
>> when e.g. connecting swordfish via web services to an SOAP
adapter of
>>
>> an SAP XI system.
>>
>>
>> What I want to do is to evaluate some of this integration
platforms and
>>
>> compare each other. Sure, this efforts depends on the skills of the
>> developers
>>
>> and the concrete use cases, but someone who uses swordfish could
possible
>>
>> give a rough figure for this efforts which is sufficient for my
needs by
>> now. J
>>
>>
>> And, maybe someone has evaluated other tools like ServiceMix or
Mule and
>>
>> has figures for these platforms too?
>>
>>
>> thanks, Chris
>>
>>
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> swordfish-dev mailing list
>> swordfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/swordfish-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> swordfish-dev mailing list
> swordfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/swordfish-dev
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
_______________________________________________
swordfish-dev mailing list
swordfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/swordfish-dev
*Oliver Wolf
*Lead Architect Runtime Platform
Tel.: +49 228-182 19059
Fax: +49 228-182 19193
Mobil: +49 160-98931313
_oliver.wolf@xxxxxxxxx
_
Wussten Sie schon? *SOPERA* <_http://www.osbf.de/de/node/1466_> hat
den Open Source Business Award 2009
<_http://www.osbf.de/en/node/1466_> verliehen bekommen!
*SOPERA GmbH - Open Source SOA
*Subscription Services, Support & Maintenance, Training,
Technical SOA Consulting & Customized Development
*www.sopera.de <**_http://www.sopera.de/_>
*SOPERA GmbH · Geschäftsführer: Dr. Ricco Deutscher, Harald Weimer,
Peter Spiegel
Sträßchensweg 10 · 53113 Bonn · Handelsregister: Bonn HRB 15336
Hohenlindnerstraße 11b · 85622 München
Vertraulichkeitshinweis: Diese Nachricht und jeder übermittelte Anhang
beinhaltet vertrauliche Informationen und ist nur für die Personen
oder das Unternehmen bestimmt, an welche sie tatsächlich gerichtet
ist. Sollten Sie nicht der Bestimmungsempfänger sein, weisen wir Sie
darauf hin, dass die Verbreitung, das (auch teilweise) Kopieren sowie
der Gebrauch der empfangenen E-Mail und der darin enthaltenen
Informationen gesetzlich verboten ist und gegebenenfalls
Schadensersatzpflichten auslösen kann. Sollten Sie diese Nachricht
aufgrund eines Übermittlungsfehlers erhalten haben, bitten wir Sie,
den Sender unverzüglich hiervon in Kenntnis zu setzen.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
swordfish-dev mailing list
swordfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/swordfish-dev
