[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [stp-pmc] FW: [soa-pmc] STP Termination Time



On 06/14/2011 12:03 PM, Mos, Adrian wrote:

[email got rejected from STP-PMC]…


From: soa-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:soa-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mos, Adrian
Sent: mardi 14 juin 2011 18:02
To: SOA PMC mailing list; stp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [soa-pmc] STP Termination Time


Hi guys,


Well, option #2 sounds the most reasonable given the circumstances but Spagic and eBPM should really migrate soon to the new Mangrove code base. It’s been a few months already that the new code-base is in place and I’m worried that if we keep using the old one they might get a bit more disconnected and will require some work to reconcile later. So Andrea, can you let me know what the migration plans are to move to Mangrove?





From: soa-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:soa-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wayne Beaton
Sent: mardi 14 juin 2011 17:20
To: soa-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx; stp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [soa-pmc] STP Termination Time


I like option #2.

Any objections?


On 06/14/2011 03:53 AM, Andrea Zoppello wrote:

Hi Wayne,

As you remark in your message, some STP components are still active.

For example the "Intermediate Model project" located at:


is still used by eBPM project ( and of course the Spagic project ), and at the moment we've not yet made a plan to move to SOA Mangrove Project.

So for me it's not a problem to terminate the STP project itself, but we need to provide a way to mantain the
old codebase.

We need to define which is the best way to do that.

Here's two proposals:

1) Ok to terminate the stp project but still ensure access to the 'old' svn repositories at least for Intermediate Model

2) Another option ( as i know probably only ebpm is still interested in stp im ) is to move the existing project to the ebpm
project repository, in that case the old stp intermediate model stuff, will be mantained by ebpm committers and mantained within ebpm project..

Any thoughs??

Let me know which is way you prefer to proceed.

Best regards
Andrea Zoppello

Il 13/06/2011 21:07, Wayne Beaton ha scritto:

Hey folks. It's time to terminate STP.  
I've started a wiki page to capture what needs to be done.  
It turns out that there are a handful of active projects that are marked  
as "components" in the foundation database that we need to sort out what  
to do with.  
I also noticed that some commits are being registered against some of  
these projects; this could be old metadata from the STP project making  
bogus claims. Or it could be people still committing against those  
projects. Whatever the case, I'd like to resolve it.  
Please take a look at the wiki page and help me resolve what needs resolvin'  
Please feel free to make edits/additions to the page as you see fit.  
I'd really like to at least initiate the review by the end of the month.  
We can queue up the action items as part of that review.  
soa-pmc mailing list  



Andrea Zoppello
Spagic Architect

Corso Stati Uniti, 23/C - 35127 Padova - Italy
Tel. +39-049.8283411
Mob. +39-345.4668537

Engineering Group
IT Solution Architect
Research & Innovation Division
Architectures & Consulting


  Respect the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

soa-pmc mailing list  

PNG image

JPEG image

JPEG image