[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
[stp-pmc] Re: Mangrove proposal
|
I'm concerned that the scope is not explicit enough. If I'm reading the
proposal correctly, the intent is to take the intermediate model that's
currently part of STP and turn it into an separate project in its own
right; in this context, the discussion of integrating the various "SOA
editors, runtime and deployment tools" makes sense. However, that bit
about the intermediate model itself is missing from the scope section.
Actually... the "description" section sounds like a better candidate for
the scope. Perhaps you can just merge these two sections.
The proposal talks about "proposed components". Are you using
"component" in the Eclipse Development Process sense? i.e. do you intend
to have different sets of commit rights for each component? Or are these
just functional areas?
HTH,
Wayne
Anne Jacko wrote:
Mike, Wayne (cc Adrian, STP PMC),
Please review and comment on the new Mangrove proposal. Thanks.
http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/mangrove/
Anne Jacko
emo@xxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Wayne Beaton, The Eclipse Foundation
http://www.eclipse.org
I'm going to EclipseCon!
http://www.eclipsecon.org