>>>> > 2. I don't know but I think it would not be a major obstacle ; note
>> > Thomas
>> > Hallgren, the Buckminster lead, voted for this bug.
>>
>> Thomas voting for bug != Thomas shipping a fully functional Git plugin
>> as part of Buckminster, unfortunately.
>
> That certainly means he has an interest into it.
Yes, that's certainly nice to know. But -- interest and intent
together don't make the software happen. Getting buckminster
to where it is now has meant lots and lots of bugs had to be
fixed in SVN providers etc, and the same will go if a new git
plugin is introduced. It just means we miss builds if the git
resolver doesn't work.
There are ways to fix this up - i.e. hack the build system to
work off checkouts/clones that have happened previously. This
would have to happen on a project-by-project basis.