Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [stp-pmc] Enterprise Component Framework creation review coming up 

Dan,
Agree on the runtime side - but I am not sure from just reading it, i.e. in the STP model OSGI can be treated as just another runtime. It might be good for one of us to have a conversation with them or join the creation review to get a better understanding. 

Carl.


Daniel Berg wrote:


I completely agree with Mike.
This proposal's main focus is runtime components to support the Eclipse component model. On the surface this doesn't appear to have complete overlaps with STP. I think it would be a good exercise to see how/if this model could be integrated into the STP model basically as another implementation type such as J2EE. I admit there are some concepts that appear to overlap but these concepts are so basic that we will find them in many of the projects. The real question is in what context are they being used? 

Regards,
Dan



*"Mike Milinkovich" <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>*
Sent by: stp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/31/2006 04:47 AM
Please respond to
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx; Please respond to
STP PMC list <stp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>


	
To
	"'STP PMC list'" <stp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
	
Subject
	RE: [stp-pmc] Enterprise Component Framework creation review coming up



	







Oisin,

If there is feedback regarding the proposal, I would like to suggest that
waiting for the Creation Review may not be the best time to address it. Or
at least not the only time.

There is a newsgroup (eclipse.technology.ecp) specifically for feedback on
the proposal. I would like to suggest that an open interaction with the
proposal team could be had there. I always like to encourage open debate on proposals. Even (especially?) if there are disagreements, it's important to 
air them transparently.

In addition, please remember that every incubating proposal is typically
looking for a PMC to graduate to, so an invitation for future collaboration 
may be an option.
All of that said, ECP's focus on enabling an OSGi runtime seems at least to 
my little mind an important differentiator.

Does this make sense?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: stp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:stp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oisin Hurley
> Sent: May 31, 2006 4:01 AM
> To: STP PMC list
> Subject: [stp-pmc] Enterprise Component Framework creation
> review coming up
>
> Guys, take a look at this one and tell me what you think. I
> think that this has a lot of overlap with what we want to do
> in STP, so what do you think?
>
>   --oh
>
> http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/ecp/
> _______________________________________________
> stp-pmc mailing list
> stp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-pmc

_______________________________________________
stp-pmc mailing list
stp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-pmc

------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
stp-pmc mailing list
stp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-pmc

Back to the top