Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [stp-dev] Moving to [SOA-DEV]

+1 

-----Original Message-----
From: stp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:stp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Adrian Mos
Sent: Freitag, 19. März 2010 09:56
To: STP Dev list
Cc: soa-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [stp-dev] Moving to [SOA-DEV]

To follow-up on this, I'd like to suggest everybody on this list to subscribe to the soa-dev list as soon as possible, by simply registering here:
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/soa-dev

I think that people will move naturally to soa-dev, once they have subscribed. And we should send regular reminders about this. However we should keep our subscriptions to stp-dev for a few more months at least I'd say, in order to see potential messages that might still come through.

cheers,
Adrian.

On Mar 19, 2010, at 9:42 AM, Andrei Shakirin wrote:

> What about week after Easter?
>  
> Regards,
> Andrei.
> 
> From: stp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:stp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> On Behalf Of Zsolt Beothy-Elo
> Sent: Donnerstag, 18. März 2010 18:16
> To: STP Dev list
> Subject: [stp-dev] Fwd: [soa-dev] WG: JWT Move Review Results
> 
> Yesterday we had the first mail on the soa-dev list, which for me raises the question when we generally should switch from the stp-dev to the soa-dev list.  SOA platform project starts to get populated. JWT, Mangrove and Swordfish already joined the project. eBAM, eBPM, and SCA tools will hopefully get their review passed in two weeks. BPMN Modeler and Policy Editor will hopefully move in the foreseeable future. 
> What is your opinion, when should we make a cut and move to the new soa-dev list?
> 
> Regards,
> Zsolt
>  
> 
> Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:
> 
>> Von: Christian Saad <saad.christian.ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Datum: 17. März 2010 17:00:27 MEZ
>> An: "soa-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <soa-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Betreff: [soa-dev] WG: JWT Move Review Results Antwort an: General 
>> discussion of SOA platform-wide or architectural issues 
>> <soa-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> the move review for the Java Workflow Tooling was successful. Thanks 
>> for your support and I'm looking forward to meeting you at EclipseCon.
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> Christian
>> 
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Anne Jacko [mailto:emo@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. März 2010 01:38
>> An: Christian Saad
>> Cc: Wayne Beaton; Webmaster(Matt Ward); Sharon Corbett
>> Betreff: JWT Move Review Results
>> 
>> Hello Christian,
>> 
>> We checked your Communication Channel this morning, and there was no 
>> request to hold your review on a conference call tomorrow. Therefore, 
>> there will be no Review Call, and the EMO has declared your review to 
>> be successful based on your review docuware and on community feedback.
>> Congratulations on your successful Move Review. Please post on your 
>> Communication Channel that your review was successful. After that 
>> your next step is to open a bug, assigned to Webmaster, with a cc to 
>> EMO and Sharon (cc'd above).
>> 
>> The bug should lists the tasks to be done to facilitate the move, and 
>> reflect the Move Plan you outlined in your Move Review docuware.
>> 
>> Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks.
>> 
>> 
>> Anne Jacko
>> emo@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> soa-dev mailing list
>> soa-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/soa-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> stp-dev mailing list
> stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev

_______________________________________________
stp-dev mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev


Back to the top