[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
[stp-dev] Re: Mangrove - SOA Modeling Framework (Proposal)
|
Hi Adrian,
sounds fine to me. When reading through the proposal, one question came up
for me about the relationships with standards: SOA Modeling Frameworks
sounds a lot like the currently developed SOA Modeling Language or short
SoaML [1] which is currently developed at the OMG (formerly called UPMS).
Some people might be confused about how Mangrove relates to this standard.
I'm really interested how this new BPM project you mention in the proposal
will look like, as it might have a lot of similarities to JWT. Also, the
eBAM project might have similarities to the JWT WAM (Workflow Administration
and Monitoring). Who will be the persons working on that so we might discuss
some possible similarities and issues in advance?
Just as a side note: in the list of interested persons you have an Oliver
Wold, but I guess you mean Wolf :-)
Best regards and enjoy some Kartoffelsalat ;-)
Florian
[1] http://www.omgwiki.org/SoaML/doku.php
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 22:06:44 +0100
From: Adrian Mos <adrian.mos@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [stp-dev] Mangrove - SOA Modeling Framework (Proposal)
To: STP Dev list <stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <C8AA79C7-D2EF-4108-B70E-9A87D633EAEF@xxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi guys,
Here's an updated version of the proposal that includes some small changes
as well as the name update. I'd appreciate if you could all give it a last
look and let me know if you have any other suggestions by Wednesday December
9th.
You will also notice that beside the known SOA sub-projects, I have also
made references to three upcoming proposals: repository, ebam and bpm. The
first one has been mentioned already in ESE'09 and it relates to a
repository for soa models. The second and third are 2 new interesting
project proposals initiated by Engineering which I believe will be sent on
this list soon and which relate to business activity monitoring and to
business process execution respectively. I believe that Mangrove will have
important connections to each of these three projects, as well as the other
established ones, as it will be used for transporting SOA artifacts between
editors, runtime and monitoring, with support for model governance through
the repository project.
Speaking about inter-project relations, can the SOPERA guys let me know if
it would be useful to mention the Policy project under "Relationship with
other Eclipse projects"? In principle I think the answer is yes, as this
would allow the transport of at least basic policy information through
mangrove.
Looking forward to your comments and to finalizing the proposal so that we
can initiate the "official" process.
cheers,
Adrian.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/stp-dev/attachments/20091203/e8f6d4e
e/mangrove-project-proposal.html
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 22:38:59 +0100
From: Juan Cadavid <juanjosecg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [stp-dev] Mangrove - SOA Modeling Framework (Proposal)
To: STP Dev list <stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:
<93ef23e40912031338u59635d54kb33f5f104d08222a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi Adrian, all,
Maybe Mangrove will also be strongly related to the BPMN2 Proposal [0]? Or
is this already included indirectly referencing the BPMN modeler project?
Cheers,
Juan
[0] http://wiki.eclipse.org/MDT/BPMN2-Proposal
Juan Cadavid
PhD Student, INRIA
Juan.Cadavid@xxxxxxxx
2009/12/3 Adrian Mos <adrian.mos@xxxxxxxx>
> Hi guys,
>
> Here's an updated version of the proposal that includes some small changes
> as well as the name update. I'd appreciate if you could all give it a last
> look and let me know if you have any other suggestions by Wednesday
December
> 9th.
>
> You will also notice that beside the known SOA sub-projects, I have also
> made references to three upcoming proposals: repository, ebam and bpm. The
> first one has been mentioned already in ESE'09 and it relates to a
> repository for soa models. The second and third are 2 new interesting
> project proposals initiated by Engineering which I believe will be sent on
> this list soon and which relate to business activity monitoring and to
> business process execution respectively. I believe that Mangrove will have
> important connections to each of these three projects, as well as the
other
> established ones, as it will be used for transporting SOA artifacts
between
> editors, runtime and monitoring, with support for model governance through
> the repository project.
>
> Speaking about inter-project relations, can the SOPERA guys let me know if
> it would be useful to mention the Policy project under "Relationship with
> other Eclipse projects"? In principle I think the answer is yes, as this
> would allow the transport of at least basic policy information through
> mangrove.
>
> Looking forward to your comments and to finalizing the proposal so that we
> can initiate the "official" process.
>
> cheers,
> Adrian.
>
> _______________________________________________
> stp-dev mailing list
> stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/stp-dev/attachments/20091203/ca33107
d/attachment.html
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
stp-dev mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev
End of stp-dev Digest, Vol 48, Issue 2
**************************************
