[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[List Home]
|
Re: [stp-dev] M3 build status...
|
- From: "Oisin Hurley" <oisin.hurley@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:07:46 +0000
- Delivered-to: stp-dev@eclipse.org
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=XIS2KsR/JVRLaYY4POfTp1Epa+ShicPCydjjAGs2UWY=; b=GYLDQxAicF+MXSFTE0TtByloPNtDrjUkMogwDpWsneK2ZJVrAPDUSBBGiGcbDZqJFf AXAIs2VPtDBX0kqgXAGIwpUn32qn0bhpc/wfNqcOGQ4ROlk6Hrtp1e1vGBCXVyzAKL6n 0HLpiEsLWq6VAT9mZ03Rg/PSZPxbBCkXwuXa8=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=dQpRis7zfFoTJB9eEmIVpMzh4H7IGabaEh4HBNwK6nGzEkmFIyKxJKsylJa7BlD+v1 gWarkQseeYFDSkQuIz+ZsFc3Q0MY7irz/dtNToTm3w8yj9oXS0hkWug+zHibz86D6WBM iYhqTYOnplIPWPMQ0mMBDeAtkDPMlZ2LzY/bw=
> Regarding STP-IM I think we'll give it a miss for M# as we didn't have the
> time to test for M3, however we'll of course target the next milestone
> release of 3.5. Would this pose a problem?
Not a problem at all, I just need to know what the decisions are
when they are made, so I can do the right thing.
> Related to this and the SVN structure, for us it makes sense to go with your
> second option (that of keeping only the trunk, no branches for 3.4.x or 3.5)
> since the intermediate model should really be completely independent of new
> features in 3.5.
That's fine. I would suggest tagging appropriately to make things a bit
easier to track.
--oh