On 11/13/08, Antoine Toulme <
antoine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> About those pesky version numbers:should we have 1.1.0.qualifier in, or do
> we need to add a M3 prefix to the qualifier ? (1.1.0.M3-qualifier)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Antoine
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Oisin Hurley <
oisin.hurley@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> I'm going to build a candidate later today, and then you can check
>> it tomorrow, and if everything is sound, then I will publicise it later
>> tomorrow evening. How does that sound?
>>
>> Ok, so who's ready early? ;)
>>
>> BPMN -- Antoine you look you are ready to rock, right?
>> SCA -- Stephane, we just have to make sure those features are in there,
>> right?
>> IM -- Adrian, Andrea, ready to go or need more time?
>> B2J -- Antony, this is stable, I'll assume it's ready to go?
>> EID -- Not ready
>> Policy -- Jerry, ready to get it on?
>>
>> NOTE -- make sure you have your version numbers right, gentlemen.
>>
>> ALSO -- don't forget your branching and your tagging strategies.
>>
>> I'm looking to pick up off the "3.5M3" tag. Please apply this when
>> you are ready for this evening's candidate.
>>
>> --oh
>> _______________________________________________
>> stp-dev mailing list
>>
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
http://www.lunar-ocean.com/blog
>
