|
Hi all,
Just short message from my side: I agree with desicion
regarding Grenoble meeting and looking forward for conference
call (where we can define main discussions points, meeting plan) and
meeting in Ludwigsburg or/and Eclipse Summit.
Probably it make sense to work a little bit more on
meeting Agenda, prepare appropriate presentations, describe alternatives to make
a final decisions.
Regards,
Andrei.
From:
stp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:stp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Adrian Mos
Sent: Dienstag, 9. September 2008 18:02
To:
STP Dev list
Subject: Re: [stp-dev] Meeting in Grenoble -> Meeting
at Eclipse Summit?
Hi Jerry, all,
OK so there will be no meeting in Grenoble this week, I think under the
current circumstances it makes perfect sense.
I think your suggestion for a separate day for the STP meeting before (or
after) Eclipse Summit makes sense, for me the 18th is ok. Thanks for offering to
sponsor a room, I hope most of us will be available then to have a substantial
meeting! :)
I think we could have a conf-call on Friday to discuss some of the current
issues and maybe set the stage for further discussions on particular topics we
wanted to raise during the meeting in Grenoble. I have created a poll, and I can
also get a phone conference number in INRIA, however it would be a French number
only.
All times are
CEST.
Talk to you soon,
Cheers,
Adrian.
On Sep 9, 2008, at 11:20 AM, Gerald Preissler wrote:
Hi all,
in my opinion the main topic for the
meeting would have been discussing the future direction of STP. Given the
circumstances, Id rather postpone the meeting to Eclipse Summit Europe if we
can hope for a better turnout then. A conf-call certainly cant replace a
face-to-face meeting, but maybe we can have one on Friday to discuss how to
proceed with the work for STP.
The one thing that Im afraid of if we
try to have the meeting /during/ Eclipse Summit is that we all will be too
busy with the conference. I propose that we have the meeting at a seperate
day, maybe Nov. 18th. If there is interest, SOPERA would sponsor a meeting
room somewhere in or around Ludwigsburg. What do you say?
Id also like
to thank Adrian for the work that he has put in planning and organizing the
meeting in Grenoble. Im really sorry that it did not work out this time, I
hope we will have better luck another time.
Best
regards
Jerry Preissler
On 08.09.08
18:41, "Adrian Mos" <adrian.mos@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi
Andrea,
Sure, we can do this, given that the number of participants
is pretty
low, I mean we can try and raise some of the most important
topics in
a conf-call, but of course the conf-call cannot replace such
a
meeting, so a conf-call for about 2h or so should be enough to
just
make a point about the plans we have for the components. It could
also
lead to other conf-calls on specific topics later on, in
preparation
for the Eclipse Summit meeting.
In any case, on
INRIA's side, the meeting rooms are still available so
I guess at this
point it's up to you all to decide who's coming and
who's not and as long
as there's participants coming, we can have
short meetings on whatever
topics we are interested in.
I'm waiting for quick feedback to
Andrea's option.
Cheers,
Adrian.
On Sep 8, 2008, at 6:35
PM, Andrea Zoppello wrote:
> Hi stp guys,
>
> After
looking at the participiant to the STP metting in grenoble, it
> seems
we'll be very few people,
> and we're evaluating if it's really the
case to make a trip to
> grenoble or if it's better to
>
reschedule the meeting in the form of a telephone conference
call.
>
> We've not lost our interest in that meeting, but our
interested is
> to meet the whole STP community
> and as
we've seen IONA ( Oisin ), intalio, SCA People are not
> attending
this meeting.
>
> When we meet in the states we agree to meet to
share ideas among all
> the
> stp guys, and if we make a meeting
with only three or four people i
> think we miss the point
> of
the meeting.
>
> Does really make sense a meeting where
only Engineering, INRIA,and
> SOPERA will be
present??
>
> If you agree tomorrow i'll proceed to cancel my
hotel reservation,
> and i'll propose to make a conference
call
> and to meet at Eclipse Summit Europe.
>
> Andrea
Zoppello
> Adrian Mos ha scritto:
>> Hi
Stephane,
>>
>> It's unfortunate that you cannot make it
to Grenoble at all, we
>> could have discussed your plans for
integration with the policy
>> editor there. A couple of quick
remarks on this: I believe the
>> integration could be done using
the IM (we should work out together
>> how policies can be
represented in the IM, I know Oisin was also
>> interested in this)
and also I guess on the SCA side, the policy
>> representation
should be done using the Policy Framework
>> specification. I'd be
very interested in how this work will
>> advance, so looking
forward to tackling this subject as soon as
>>
possible.
>> In any case we will discuss about the future plans for
the IM with
>> Engineering and the rest of the STP participants in
Grenoble and
>> the policy integration should also be on the table
then. We will of
>> course keep everyone updated on our discussions
through this
>> mailing list and the wiki.
>>
>>
Cheers,
>> Adrian.
>>
>> On Sep 7, 2008, at 4:10
PM, Stéphane Drapeau wrote:
>>
>>>
Hi,
>>>
>>> Sorry, I'm not available to attend the
next meeting in Grenoble.
>>> I hope we can meet us at Eclipse
Summit. In particular, I would
>>> like to work on the
integration between the policy editor and SCA.
>>> David, Jerry,
do you have any plan on this ?
>>>
>>> An other
question for all of you... Do you think that it would be
>>>
meaningful to include the leader of each project/component in
the
>>> PMC of STP? I think that it makes
sense.
>>>
>>>
Regards,
>>>
>>> Stéphane Drapeau
>>>
Obeo
>>>
>>>
>>>
_______________________________________________
>>> stp-dev
mailing list
>>> stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
>> stp-dev mailing
list
>> stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
>
> *Andrea Zoppello*
>
___________________________________________
> <www.spagoworld.org>
>
>
Spagic Architect
>
___________________________________________
>
>
Architect
> Research & Innovation Division
> *Engineering
Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
> *
> Corso Stati Uniti, 23/C -
35127 Padova - Italy
> Phone: +39-049.8692511
Fax:+39-049.8692566
>
> *www.eng.it
www.spagoworld.org*
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
> stp-dev mailing
list
> stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
stp-dev
mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev
_______________________________________________
stp-dev
mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev
|
