[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: R: [stp-dev] Meeting in Grenoble, follow-up
|
Hi Andrea,
Sure, we can do this, given that the number of participants is pretty
low, I mean we can try and raise some of the most important topics in
a conf-call, but of course the conf-call cannot replace such a
meeting, so a conf-call for about 2h or so should be enough to just
make a point about the plans we have for the components. It could also
lead to other conf-calls on specific topics later on, in preparation
for the Eclipse Summit meeting.
In any case, on INRIA's side, the meeting rooms are still available so
I guess at this point it's up to you all to decide who's coming and
who's not and as long as there's participants coming, we can have
short meetings on whatever topics we are interested in.
I'm waiting for quick feedback to Andrea's option.
Cheers,
Adrian.
On Sep 8, 2008, at 6:35 PM, Andrea Zoppello wrote:
Hi stp guys,
After looking at the participiant to the STP metting in grenoble, it
seems we'll be very few people,
and we're evaluating if it's really the case to make a trip to
grenoble or if it's better to
reschedule the meeting in the form of a telephone conference call.
We've not lost our interest in that meeting, but our interested is
to meet the whole STP community
and as we've seen IONA ( Oisin ), intalio, SCA People are not
attending this meeting.
When we meet in the states we agree to meet to share ideas among all
the
stp guys, and if we make a meeting with only three or four people i
think we miss the point
of the meeting.
Does really make sense a meeting where only Engineering, INRIA,and
SOPERA will be present??
If you agree tomorrow i'll proceed to cancel my hotel reservation,
and i'll propose to make a conference call
and to meet at Eclipse Summit Europe.
Andrea Zoppello
Adrian Mos ha scritto:
Hi Stephane,
It's unfortunate that you cannot make it to Grenoble at all, we
could have discussed your plans for integration with the policy
editor there. A couple of quick remarks on this: I believe the
integration could be done using the IM (we should work out together
how policies can be represented in the IM, I know Oisin was also
interested in this) and also I guess on the SCA side, the policy
representation should be done using the Policy Framework
specification. I'd be very interested in how this work will
advance, so looking forward to tackling this subject as soon as
possible.
In any case we will discuss about the future plans for the IM with
Engineering and the rest of the STP participants in Grenoble and
the policy integration should also be on the table then. We will of
course keep everyone updated on our discussions through this
mailing list and the wiki.
Cheers,
Adrian.
On Sep 7, 2008, at 4:10 PM, Stéphane Drapeau wrote:
Hi,
Sorry, I'm not available to attend the next meeting in Grenoble.
I hope we can meet us at Eclipse Summit. In particular, I would
like to work on the integration between the policy editor and SCA.
David, Jerry, do you have any plan on this ?
An other question for all of you... Do you think that it would be
meaningful to include the leader of each project/component in the
PMC of STP? I think that it makes sense.
Regards,
Stéphane Drapeau
Obeo
_______________________________________________
stp-dev mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev
_______________________________________________
stp-dev mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev
--
*Andrea Zoppello*
___________________________________________
<www.spagoworld.org>
Spagic Architect
___________________________________________
Architect
Research & Innovation Division
*Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
*
Corso Stati Uniti, 23/C - 35127 Padova - Italy
Phone: +39-049.8692511 Fax:+39-049.8692566
*www.eng.it www.spagoworld.org*
_______________________________________________
stp-dev mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev
