[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [stp-dev] Follow on discussion for the Hybrid Model Required?
|
Hi,
I've understand that the last model on the wiki is the final version
that will be proposed.
I think that most of the doubt is due to the introduction of the
"Endpoint" entity.
This is because the term endpoint has very differente meanings in
different context.
We've introduced this just to make the stp intermediate model able to
defining
concepts of Webservices world, but when we're using this model to define
"Process"
we doesn't really need it.
So for me it's right to keep but we need to explain very well that
concept when we're going
to propose this model.
By the way i've no problem to have a further conference call if it's needed.
Andrea Zoppello
Adrian Skehill ha scritto:
Guillaume, Stp-dev community,
Do we need to have a follow on conversation to see
if we can finalise the STP Hybrid Model this week? Looking at the
threads, I think we're getting close, but if we need a call to help
clarify matters, it's very easy to arrange.
Adrian.
----------------------------
IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
Registered Number: 171387
Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, Ireland
_______________________________________________
stp-dev mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev
