[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [stp-dev] Intermediate Hybrid Model Discussion
|
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for posting that. This is certainly very useful.
Just a few additional ideas here:
On the meta model, it might be useful to have a Service Contract
associated with the Service, as all types of Services typically have
some sort of a contract or other - I know certain editors/technologies
may not deal with the interface directly, but its normally there
somehow. This could be WSDL, a Java interface, XML Schema or even a
worddoc describing how it's used.
Also, it might be good to add a 'metadata' map to the Service where
arbitrary key-value pairs can be registered. This could be used by
editors to enhance the metamodel with optional extra metadata that the
transformations could use to make the migration from one model to
another smoother / less lossy.
Just my 2c,
David
Adrian Mos wrote:
Hi David, all,
I have created a page that illustrates a sample scenario involving the
meta-model
at http://wiki.eclipse.org/Sample_scenario_involving_the_intermediate_meta-model
It is rather rudimentary and does not cover the entire set of entities
of the meta-model but I believes it captures the essential
functionality (i.e. moving between editors that deal with different
SOA concerns).
I imagine some things might need further clarification, I will update
the page appropriately as questions arise.
best regards,
Adrian.
On Aug 24, 2007, at 5:43 PM, David Bosschaert wrote:
Hi Adrian,
Do you think you can provide the example as discussed well in time to
consider it with the proposal. It would greatly help my understanding
of the proposed model.
Thanks!
David
Adrian Mos wrote:
Forgot to attach the link referred to in the text...
[1] http://wiki.eclipse.org/MinutesAug23
On Aug 24, 2007, at 5:21 PM, Adrian Mos wrote:
Hi Guys,
To follow-up to Adrian Skehill's email, we had an interesting
discussion [1] regarding the proposed intermediate model to be used
in STP (by editors that want to benefit from facilitated state
transfer). We would like to speed up the conceptual phase of this
model and start its implementation so I am proposing the date of
Friday 31st as the last day to make any changes to it. This would
allow us to move forward quickly and not hold back developments on
components where this will be used such as the Service Creation
component.
So please come forward with any suggestions and additions to it
until next Friday.
best regards,
Adrian.
---------------
*Adrian Mos*
ObjectWeb Project
SOA Technical Lead
adrian.mos@xxxxxxxx <mailto:adrian.mos@xxxxxxxx>
+33 4 76 61 54 02
*INRIA Rhone-Alpes*
655 avenue de l'Europe - Montbonnot
38 334 Saint Ismier Cedex France
_______________________________________________
stp-dev mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
stp-dev mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev
----------------------------
IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
Registered Number: 171387
Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, Ireland
_______________________________________________
stp-dev mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
stp-dev mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev
----------------------------
IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
Registered Number: 171387
Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, Ireland