[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [stp-dev] About BPMN metamodel
|
Hi Juan,
The BPMN metamodel is made to support the BPMN notation for a BPMN modeler.
It is does not natively support all the type of extra properties
defined in the BPMN specification.
However the model can be attached any number of properties by using
EMF annotations.
So in the case you mention the approach we recommend is to define an
annotation to set on the org.eclipse.stp.Activity class.
An Activity is a BPMN Task when its ActivityType is Task.
This tutorial describes how to expose such annotation in the properties view:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/STP_BPMN_Presentation_Hands_on_tutorial#Extending_the_modeler:_defining_a_custom_property
Hugues
On 7/17/07, JUAN JOSE CADAVID GOMEZ <jcadav10@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello,
Some time ago I wrote about a college project currently in progress about extending the STP BPMN modeler for M2M transformations. I have checked the bpmn.ecore metamodel against the BPMN specification and noticed that in the specification there are two Activity subtypes declared, Task and Sub-Process. However, I can't seem to find these two subtypes in the STP BPMN schema.
My concern is that in the specification, the Task element has an attribute called TaskType, with possible values (Service | Receive | Send | User | Script | Abstract | Manual | Reference | None) which I need to capture for the transformation rules I'm writing. However, I don't see how to obtain it with the current metamodel, since the Task element doesn't exist. Can somebody help me here?
I appreciate your attention.
-Juan
_______________________________________________
stp-dev mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev
