Actually I was only referring the “properties”
implementation used in the docs and unit tests.
d.
From:
stp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:stp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Daniel Berg
Sent: 16 August 2006 19:00
To: STP Dev list
Subject: Re: [stp-dev] writing an
introspector...
Are you referring to the Java implementation? If
so this is true. We have not contributed the Java implementation yet.
Regards,
Dan
-------------------------------------------------
Daniel Berg
Rational SOA Tools Lead
(919) 486-0047
T/L 526-0047
http://blogs.tap.ibm.com/weblogs/page/danberg@xxxxxxxxxx
http://planetradical.raleigh.ibm.com/
"Developers are like artists; they produce their best work if they have
the freedom to do so, but they need good tools." -- Werner Vogels
Oisin Hurley <ohurley@xxxxxxxx>
Sent
by: stp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
08/16/2006 11:14 AM
Please
respond to
STP Dev list <stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
To
|
STP Dev list <stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
|
Re: [stp-dev] writing an introspector...
|
|
>
I also ran into trouble when I tried to extend the SCA model to add
> a new implementation type. I had a look at
the properties example
> but the ecore files in CVS reference some IBM
resources that
> haven’t been committed.
David - what's missing from here? Dan,
Michael, did something get
left out by accident?
--oh_______________________________________________
stp-dev mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev