RE: [stp-dev] Subproject issues

["Trieloff, Carl" <CTRIELOFF@xxxxxxxx>]

Both B2J and BPMN where part of the proposal and board approval process. They are
key a key sample in STP to
	- Make sure we have the frameworks in place to have STP extensible enough to
	support other languages (C++, COBOL, BPEL... and hopefully one day PHP :-)
	- Make sure that "technical participants" that integrate with the assembly model
	and then bind to the Assembly model language binding like B2J will do with Java. This
	means that these services created with eclipse with be able to deploy onto any 
	container supported by the assembly model and SCA

Technically, we core was not on original list, but we all agreed that we
want a "core" assembly for all subprojects in the f2f. 

In the IRC and last two weeks call we decided to seed the website and then the dev list
can come back with edits to update the site. I will also create pages for about, development
resource, community and contributors and committers, which then can be reviewed by all and
updated. I am hoping to bring one or two of these sections up this week.

I will NOT create any content for the subprojects, that needs to be extensively discussed on the
IRC and dev list.

Hope than helps.
Carl.


-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Daume [mailto:Stefan.Daume@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 8:13 AM
To: STP Dev list
Cc: bjorn@xxxxxxxxxxx; James Moody
Subject: Re: [stp-dev] Subproject issues


The STP project including the subprojects was presented as is to the 
Eclipse board. The STP project was accepted on the basis of this 
structure acknowledging that those were in scope. I am sure that Carl 
can add to this if necessary.

     Stefan



Daniel Berg wrote:

>
> I was looking at the defined sub projects and two of them stood out: 
>  STP BPEL 2 Java (B2J) and STP BPMN (BPMN).  The problem I have with 
> these subprojects is that they start overlapping with implementation 
> content contributions from other projects within Eclipse.  For 
> example, these seem to be obvious overlaps with the BPEL project 
> within Eclipse.  
>
> Why are we defining content subprojects which clearly belongs in other 
> projects within Eclipse?
>
> STP is a platform for component implementation assembly and 
> deployment.  It is not in the business of editing or creating the 
> specific component implementations.  This is best left to the 
> implementation providers from other projects within Eclipse.
>
> I suggest that these subprojects be removed from STP and their 
> contributions added to the proper Eclipse subprojects.
>
> Regards,
> Dan
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>stp-dev mailing list
>stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev
>  
>

_______________________________________________
stp-dev mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev