stp-dev http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/stp-dev/maillist.html stp-dev en-us Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:30:14 GMT Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:30:14 GMT http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss MHonArc RSS 2.0 RCFile webmaster@eclipse.org (Webmaster) webmaster@eclipse.org (Webmaster) stp-dev http://www.eclipse.org/eclipse.org-common/themes/Phoenix/images/eclipse_home_header.jpg http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/stp-dev/maillist.html Re: [stp-dev] Project name proposals - please vote http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/stp-dev/msg02757.html Hi again guys, Thank you all for voting! So the vote has ended and the winner is... Mangrove - SOA Modeling Framework. Marc you are the official winner! :) Oisin and Florian you are the runner-ups, could the 3 of view please send me your postal addresses where I can send you a little surprise present from INRIA (surprise for me too at this point :)) ). Thank you all, Adrian. On Nov 13, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Adrian Mos wrote: > Hi guys, > > Based on the feedback received, I've set up a doodle poll to get your votes on the name for the upcoming STP-IM project proposal. I hope I haven't missed any suggestion, if I did please let me know. Could you please make sure you vote for both a short name and a long name. > I'd appreciate a vote by next Wednesday (Nov 18th). > > http://www.doodle.com/igpxdeaaehyybpcz > > Thanks! > Adrian. > > _______________________________________________ > stp-dev mailing list > stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev ]]> Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:25:59 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/stp-dev/msg02757.html adrian.mos@xxxxxxx (Adrian Mos) Re: [stp-dev] Last chance for Feedback: SOA Tree Proposal http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/stp-dev/msg02756.html Hi Zsolt, thanks for the feedback and sorry for the slow reply. My replies inline: great, with the vote closing today, it looks like this is the winner :) the instance of the Core Model will represent the "current" snapshot of the set of existing SOA artif... Hi Zsolt, thanks for the feedback and sorry for the slow reply. My replies inline: > The most important first: +1 for Mangrove great, with the vote closing today, it looks like this is the winner :) > Also a few questions / remarks: > What would be the relationship between the Core Model and a repository. Would you store the model in the repository or does it only exist in the local workspace? the instance of the Core Model will represent the "current" snapshot of the set of existing SOA artifacts. This core model is a good candidate I think to store in the EMF modeling repository because this would allow for versioning and other things. > What do you mean with "Obtaining information from SOA repositories"? Does that mean the model includes all relevant informations available in the repository or is it basically just a list of links to the information? good question: I think that some basic information can be extracted from SOA repositories (typical example is a service name, its bindings and other elements that are part of the core metamodel). For complete information it makes more sense to provide a link to the SOA repository, potentially through a property whose key could be something like "repository-link" and value the actual URI maybe for the repo. > You also mention runtime data from monitoring that could be included into the Core Model. Does the mean we would a further monitoring model that is fed by a monitoring tool and synchronized with the core model? Here I just mean that we could have one or several transformations that would bring in some monitoring data from monitoring projects, similarly to how we'd bring in SOA repository info. For instance, an average response time for a service could be added as a property to service elements (we have already experimented with such connections using STP-IM and a monitoring system for SCA). Hope this helps and I will make some small additions to the proposal to make it more clear on these points. Regards, Adrian. ]]> Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:16:01 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/stp-dev/msg02756.html adrian.mos@xxxxxxx (Adrian Mos) [stp-dev] Project name proposals - please vote http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/stp-dev/msg02755.html Hi guys, Based on the feedback received, I've set up a doodle poll to get your votes on the name for the upcoming STP-IM project proposal. I hope I haven't missed any suggestion, if I did please let me know. Could you please make sure you vote for both a s... Hi guys, Based on the feedback received, I've set up a doodle poll to get your votes on the name for the upcoming STP-IM project proposal. I hope I haven't missed any suggestion, if I did please let me know. Could you please make sure you vote for both a short name and a long name. I'd appreciate a vote by next Wednesday (Nov 18th). http://www.doodle.com/igpxdeaaehyybpcz Thanks! Adrian. ]]> Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:18:14 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/stp-dev/msg02755.html adrian.mos@xxxxxxx (Adrian Mos) Fwd: [stp-dev] Last chance for Feedback: SOA Tree Proposal http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/stp-dev/msg02754.html Hi Adrian,sorry for the late response, but I hope I am still in time.The most important first: +1 for MangroveAlso a few questions / remarks:What would be the relationship between the Core Model and a repository. Would you store the model in the repository...
Hi Adrian,
sorry for the late response, but I hope I am still in time.
The most important first: +1 for Mangrove
Also a few questions / remarks:
What would be the relationship between the Core Model and a repository. Would you store the model in the repository or does it only exist in the local workspace?
What do you mean with "Obtaining information from SOA repositories"? Does that mean the model includes all relevant informations available in the repository or is it basically just a list of links to the information?
You also mention runtime data from monitoring that could be included into the  Core Model. Does the mean we would a further monitoring model that is fed by a monitoring tool and synchronized with the core model?
I think a small picture / diagram could make the relationship between the components of the SOA Tree project and the components of the other projects more obvious.

Regards,
Zsolt

Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:

Von: Adrian Mos <adrian.mos@xxxxxxxx>
Datum: 4. November 2009 16:06:38 MEZ
An: Zsolt Beothy-Elo <zsolt.beothy-elo@xxxxxxxxx>
Betreff: Fwd: [stp-dev] Last chance for Feedback: SOA Tree Proposal

Hi Zsolt,

I'm sending you this directly as I'm not sure you're on stp-dev yet.  
Of course feel free to give any feedback either directly to me or on  
the list.

cheers,
Adrian.

Begin forwarded message:

From: Adrian Mos <adrian.mos@xxxxxxxx>
Date: November 4, 2009 3:42:27 PM GMT+01:00
To: STP Dev list <stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [stp-dev] Last chance for Feedback: SOA Tree Proposal
Reply-To: STP Dev list <stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi all,

So here's an updated version of the proposal to move the STP-IM to  
sub-project status. You have seen a first draft circulated before  
ESE and this is a slightly updated version.

I'd like to get your input on this by the end of next week, by lucky  
Friday 13th. After that I'd like to move forward with the process  
and get this done as soon as possible. Oisin, could you please let  
me know what we need to do to get this rolling once we're happy with  
the proposal?

thanks,
Adrian.

Attachment: SOA Tree - Project Proposal-draft4.doc
Description: SOA Tree - Project Proposal-draft4.doc

> _______________________________________________

> stp-dev mailing list

> stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev

]]> Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:26:49 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/stp-dev/msg02754.html zsolt.beothy-elo@xxxxxxx (Zsolt Beothy-Elo) [stp-dev] Final Candidate for Helios M3 available http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/stp-dev/msg02753.html Check out http://build.eclipse.org/stp/committers/2.1.0.200911101347 this is the final release candidate (unless something is busted) so please run your tests and give me a thumbs-up before 5pm CET tomorrow (11th November). Then I will promote it to the He... Check out http://build.eclipse.org/stp/committers/2.1.0.200911101347 this is the final release candidate (unless something is busted) so please run your tests and give me a thumbs-up before 5pm CET tomorrow (11th November). Then I will promote it to the Helios site. --oh ]]> Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:37:46 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/stp-dev/msg02753.html oisin.hurley@xxxxxxx (Oisin Hurley) Re: [stp-dev] Helios M3+3 due 11 Nov 09 http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/stp-dev/msg02752.html Ok, what should be the final candidate build is happening at this moment in time. --oh Ok, what should be the final candidate build is happening at this moment in time. --oh ]]> Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:30:12 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/stp-dev/msg02752.html oisin.hurley@xxxxxxx (Oisin Hurley) Re: [stp-dev] Helios M3+3 due 11 Nov 09 http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/stp-dev/msg02751.html Thanks Antoine! Only one more to go - IM. --oh Thanks Antoine! Only one more to go - IM. --oh ]]> Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:25:13 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/stp-dev/msg02751.html oisin.hurley@xxxxxxx (Oisin Hurley) Re: [stp-dev] Helios M3+3 due 11 Nov 09 http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/stp-dev/msg02750.html _______________________________________________ stp-dev mailing list stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 02:47, Stephane Drapeau <Stephane.Drapeau@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Ready for SCA Tools.

Cheers,

Stephane Drapeau
Obeo

Oisin Hurley a écrit :

The first of the reminders :)

Please note that M3+3 is due out 11 Nov 09, in a little over
a week. For this build, we will follow our usual procedure. Projects
should tag their source trees with the tag 3.6M3. Don't forget to
update any *minor* versions of plugins and features. If you have
added any features to your build, I'll need to know to update the
Helios contribution feature model, as well as the top-level build's
gathering feature.

For M2 we had an issue with signing, the plan is to have this
fixed for M3.

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=292646

As usual, let me know if there are any questions or concerns.

 --oh
_______________________________________________
stp-dev mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev

 

_______________________________________________
stp-dev mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev

]]> Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:08:43 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/stp-dev/msg02750.html antoine@xxxxxxx (Antoine Toulme) [stp-dev] Hudson build is back to normal: stp.toplevel.trunk.jdk5 #67 http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/stp-dev/msg02749.html See &lt;https://build.eclipse.org/hudson/job/stp.toplevel.trunk.jdk5/67/changes&gt; See <https://build.eclipse.org/hudson/job/stp.toplevel.trunk.jdk5/67/changes> ]]> Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:38:35 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/stp-dev/msg02749.html hudsonbuild@xxxxxxx (Hudson Builder ') Re: [stp-dev] Eclipse Helios M3+3 11 Nov 2009 http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/stp-dev/msg02748.html It's not tomorrow yet, but there's an *unsigned* committer build p2 site up at http://build.eclipse.org/stp/committers/2.1.0.200911091747 for smoke-testing. Do update a fresh 3.6M3 on the platform of your choice and test your stuff. cheers --oh > Tomorrow (Tuesday 10th) morning, I will announce a > site candidate on this list for you to use as input to > smoke-testing. It's not tomorrow yet, but there's an *unsigned* committer build p2 site up at http://build.eclipse.org/stp/committers/2.1.0.200911091747 for smoke-testing. Do update a fresh 3.6M3 on the platform of your choice and test your stuff. cheers --oh ]]> Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:19:24 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/stp-dev/msg02748.html oisin.hurley@xxxxxxx (Oisin Hurley)