stp-dev

[stp-dev] Retirement of inactive components in STP

oisin.hurley@xxxxxxx (Oisin Hurley) — Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:25:33 GMT

As you may know, STP has a diverse set of components that
have each delivered value to an overall suite of capabilities.

Each component has had a different activity profile. Some
components continue to be active and some others just taper
off. There's many reasons for it, but what it comes down
to is that we need to make a decision on what to do with
inactive code. We can't go on receiving bug reports if
the code is not going to be fixed, and if no-one takes
this on, then the code is not going to be consumable.

Right now I'm looking at two projects that seem to be
in this category.

1) STP SOAS
http://www.eclipse.org/stp/soas/index.php

This code was originally contributed by Sybase a couple
of years back and implements a flexible deployment
system for artifacts. Unfortunately, Sybase has withdrawn
from the project and there is no-one to replace them
in maintaining this code.

2) STP ServiceCreation (SC)
http://www.eclipse.org/stp/sc/

This code was contributed by IONA at the start of the
project, and it was worked on to provide support for
JAXWS-based web services. One persistent criticism of
this project was that it didn't live in the WebTools
project, where Web Services development tools are
hosted. People found this confusing, and consumers
of WTP didn't think it would be necessary to consume
another project.

In response, we at IONA have decided to halt work on
the existing Service Creation code in STP, and instead
contribute fresh work, based on the WTP frameworks to
the WTP Incubator. See the bugzilla[0] for the proposal
and the code.

The following has been agreed by the STP PMC:

Retired components will be moved to a special archived
area that will not be part of our regular builds. All
bugs reported against archived components will be closed
as WONTFIX. Website pages and wiki pages will be moved
to special archival areas in each medium.

When will this happen?  The foundation are looking to
restructure SVN repositories to help with streamlining
infrastructural procedures, and the retirement will take
place at the time of restructuring.

I'll send out SVN repository restructuring details for
discussion to these lists.

best regards
 Oisin Hurley, STP PMC Lead


[0] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=248630

Re: [stp-dev] [BPMN] Call for interested parties

antoine@xxxxxxx (Antoine Toulme) — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:56:09 GMT

Thanks Adrian, I'll ask the EMO.

On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Adrian Mos <adrian.mos@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Antoine,

I am certainly interested in the creation of the BPMN project, so you can put my name on the list.

Cheers,
Adrian.

On Sep 30, 2008, at 6:49 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:

Hi all,

the BPMN modeler component has put online a proposal [0] to move from the status of component to the status of sub-project.

I know that the good people working on STP-IM and JWT use the BPMN modeler, or at least interface with the models it creates. Would you be interested into being cited as interested parties ?

Please come and discuss this proposal on the BPMN newsgroup [1].

[0]: http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/bpmn-modeler/

[1]: http://www.eclipse.org/newsportal/thread.php?group=eclipse.bpmn-modeler

Thanks,

Antoine

--
http://www.lunar-ocean.com/blog

_______________________________________________
stp-dev mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev

--
http://www.lunar-ocean.com/blog

Re: [stp-dev] [BPMN] Call for interested parties

adrian.mos@xxxxxxx (Adrian Mos) — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:54:57 GMT

Hi Antoine,

I am certainly interested in the creation of the BPMN project, so you can put my name on the list.

Cheers,

Adrian.

On Sep 30, 2008, at 6:49 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:

Hi all,

the BPMN modeler component has put online a proposal [0] to move from the status of component to the status of sub-project.

I know that the good people working on STP-IM and JWT use the BPMN modeler, or at least interface with the models it creates. Would you be interested into being cited as interested parties ?

Please come and discuss this proposal on the BPMN newsgroup [1].

[0]: http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/bpmn-modeler/

[1]: http://www.eclipse.org/newsportal/thread.php?group=eclipse.bpmn-modeler

Thanks,

Antoine

--
http://www.lunar-ocean.com/blog

_______________________________________________
stp-dev mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev

Re: [stp-dev] Re: [xef] Open defects

davidb@xxxxxxx (David Bosschaert) — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 09:03:54 GMT

Hi Andrei, Alexey,

I have committed the patch + test fix for 225124.

Best regards,

David

David Bosschaert wrote:

Hi Andrei,
Not quite, unfortunately.
The patch to 225126 does not contain a patch to the unit tests (org.eclipse.stp.xef.test) and causes a lot of compilation errors there. The patch to 255124 causes 2 test failures (which Alexey identified in a comment to the bug). I'm currently looking at these two failures and see if I can fix them (possibly using Alexey's suggestions).
I've commented on the bugs to mark their current state...
Cheers,
David
Andrei Shakirin wrote:
Hi David,
Pathes for both defects are attached, so it enough just to apply and test them.
Regards,
Andrei.
-----Original Message----- From: stp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:stp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Bosschaert Sent: Dienstag, 7. Oktober 2008 17:23 To: Alexey Markevich Cc: STP Dev list Subject: [stp-dev] Re: [xef] Open defects
Hi Alexey,
I'm looking at them right now.
David
Alexey Markevich wrote:
Hello David,
Please let me know about status of defects (links below)
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=225124
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=225126
---------------------------- IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland) Registered Number: 171387 Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, Ireland _______________________________________________ stp-dev mailing list stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev
----------------------------
IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
Registered Number: 171387
Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, Ireland
_______________________________________________
stp-dev mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev


----------------------------
IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
Registered Number: 171387
Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, Ireland

Re: [stp-dev] Re: [xef] Open defects

davidb@xxxxxxx (David Bosschaert) — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:50:18 GMT

Hi Andrei,

Not quite, unfortunately.

The patch to 225126 does not contain a patch to the unit tests (org.eclipse.stp.xef.test) and causes a lot of compilation errors there. The patch to 255124 causes 2 test failures (which Alexey identified in a comment to the bug). I'm currently looking at these two failures and see if I can fix them (possibly using Alexey's suggestions).

I've commented on the bugs to mark their current state...

Cheers,

David

Andrei Shakirin wrote:

Hi David,

Pathes for both defects are attached, so it enough just to apply and test them.

Regards,
Andrei.

-----Original Message-----
From: stp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:stp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Bosschaert
Sent: Dienstag, 7. Oktober 2008 17:23
To: Alexey Markevich
Cc: STP Dev list
Subject: [stp-dev] Re: [xef] Open defects

Hi Alexey,

I'm looking at them right now.

David

Alexey Markevich wrote:

Hello David,

Please let me know about status of defects (links below)

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=225124
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=225126


----------------------------
IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland) Registered Number: 171387 Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, Ireland
_______________________________________________
stp-dev mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev


----------------------------
IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
Registered Number: 171387
Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, Ireland

RE: [stp-dev] Re: [xef] Open defects

andrei.shakirin@xxxxxxx (Andrei Shakirin) — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:28:16 GMT

Hi David,

Pathes for both defects are attached, so it enough just to apply and test them.

Regards,
Andrei.

-----Original Message-----
From: stp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:stp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Bosschaert
Sent: Dienstag, 7. Oktober 2008 17:23
To: Alexey Markevich
Cc: STP Dev list
Subject: [stp-dev] Re: [xef] Open defects

Hi Alexey,

I'm looking at them right now.

David

Alexey Markevich wrote:
> Hello David,
>
> Please let me know about status of defects (links below)
>
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=225124
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=225126
>

----------------------------
IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland) Registered Number: 171387 Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, Ireland

[stp-dev] Re: [xef] Open defects

davidb@xxxxxxx (David Bosschaert) — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:22:44 GMT

Hi Alexey,

I'm looking at them right now.

David

Alexey Markevich wrote:

Hello David,

Please let me know about status of defects (links below)

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=225124
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=225126


----------------------------
IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
Registered Number: 171387
Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, Ireland

[stp-dev] [xef] Open defects

a_markevich@xxxxxxx (Alexey Markevich) — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:26:42 GMT

Hello David,

Please let me know about status of defects (links below)

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=225124
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=225126

--
Regards, Alexey

[stp-dev] Re: Tag for 1.0.1

antoine@xxxxxxx (Antoine Toulme) — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 08:55:47 GMT

Guys, as Denis Roy recommends[0], please make sure you have a map file for 1.0.1 pointing to your 1.0.1 tag if that's not the case already.

Cheers,

Antoine

[0]: http://www.eclipse.org/newsportal/article.php?id=191&group=eclipse.technology.babel#191

On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Antoine Toulme <antoine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi everyone,

I tagged BPMN for 1.0.1 and I created a version in Bugzilla for the SOA product named 1.0.1.

I also created the map file for this version for Babel.

Hopefully I should be able to reference the new map file in Babel shortly.

Thanks,

Antoine

--
http://www.lunar-ocean.com/blog

--
http://www.lunar-ocean.com/blog

[stp-dev] Re: [jwt-dev] [BPMN] Call for interested parties

antoine@xxxxxxx (Antoine Toulme) — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:31:59 GMT

Thanks Marc, I have asked the EMO to add you there.

On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Marc Dutoo <marc.dutoo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Antoine

Good news, sure we're interested ! Put Florian and me there.

Regards,
Marc

Antoine Toulme a écrit :

Hi all,

the BPMN modeler component has put online a proposal [0] to move from the status of component to the status of sub-project.

I know that the good people working on STP-IM and JWT use the BPMN modeler, or at least interface with the models it creates. Would you be interested into being cited as interested parties ?
Please come and discuss this proposal on the BPMN newsgroup [1].

[0]: http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/bpmn-modeler/
[1]: http://www.eclipse.org/newsportal/thread.php?group=eclipse.bpmn-modeler

Thanks,

Antoine

--
http://www.lunar-ocean.com/blog

------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
jwt-dev mailing list
jwt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jwt-dev

--
http://www.lunar-ocean.com/blog