Re: [soa-pmc] Request: "works with" RestDoc-renderer

[<Marc.Gille@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

+1

-----Original Message-----
From: soa-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:soa-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mos, Adrian
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 11:02 AM
To: SOA PMC mailing list
Subject: Re: [soa-pmc] Request: "works with" RestDoc-renderer

This makes sense, it's a clear optional works-with dependency to me.
+1
Adrian.

-----Original Message-----
From: soa-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:soa-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oliver Kopp
Sent: 28 February 2014 22:57
To: SOA PMC mailing list
Subject: [soa-pmc] Request: "works with" RestDoc-renderer

Hi,

I'm documenting the REST API of Winery using RestDoc (http://www.restdoc.org). To "read" restdoc, either a plain OPTIONS request can be made or "RestDoc renderer"
(https://github.com/hoegertn/restdoc-renderer) can be used.

To reduce the amount of third party libraries to be checked by the IP team, I request to treat "RestDoc renderer" as "works with". As far as I understood the "Guidelines for the review of third party dependencies" as of June 21, 2007, that approval allows me to link to the RestDoc renderer if the user has installed it for itself. Or did I go wrong there?

Cheers,

Oliver
_______________________________________________
soa-pmc mailing list
soa-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/soa-pmc
_______________________________________________
soa-pmc mailing list
soa-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/soa-pmc