| [smila-dev] search api : result structure |
hi, I have posted on the wiki page a discussion note, to which nobody replied yet. hence, in case u missed it, I want to give a gentle hint via the mailing list and suggest to start/continue discussion by mail of these items that I just copied from the wiki page: --------------------------------- Discussion Top 2 TOP 3 TOP 4 return binary content
---------------------------------- adding to this list I want this point: top 5 result record vs. result item since the results are returned as part of one record now (see top 2), I suggest to use a diff. wording here. I would talk of result *items* instead of result *records*, since they are not records anymore (in a technical sense) and it gets confusing when classes and documentation still talks about result *record* (at least I was confused in the beginning). hence, I would rename the ResultRecordAccessor -> ResultItemAccessor which yields IMO a clearer distinction to the ResultAccessor. Thomas Menzel @ brox IT-Solutions GmbH Taglocity Tags: smila
|