Hi Daniel,
Ah, ok. I wasnt quite
sure about this section and thought they were 2 options and one was impl'ed…
Good that you took
care of it.
Kind regards
Thomas Menzel @ brox IT-Solutions GmbH
From: smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Daniel.Stucky@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Freitag, 16. Oktober 2009 09:47
To: smila-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: AW: [smila-dev] wiki : proposal to seperate open/WIP
conceptsandimplemented ones
Hi Tom,
I like your changes to the page structure. I
updated some minor things and I moved the content of page “Usage of
DeltaIndexingManager by CrawlerControler alone ” back to the main page, because
it was only an idea and was not implemented, so it must not be listed under
“Implemented Changes”.
Bye,
Daniel
Von:
smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im
Auftrag von Thomas Menzel
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Oktober 2009 21:02
An: Smila project developer mailing list
Betreff: RE: [smila-dev] wiki : proposal to seperate open/WIP conceptsandimplemented
ones
Hi,
i just updated the
wiki area for delta indexing manager discussion similar to what I have outlined
in this mail and hopefully works better.
In essence I have restructured
the page and singled out each change as its own section and moved all
implemented ones to their own page. In doing so I have left the content of each
item as it was except for giving it a hopefully descriptive title and other
minor changes.
Really I didn’t set
out to do this but when I looked at the DIM interface I had the same idea to
extract a session interface but had lots of problems getting a grip on the
content of this page. So I went to work and afterwards added my 2 cents in
regard to the Session interface.
Plz see
http://wiki.eclipse.org/SMILA/Specifications/DeltaIndexingAndConnectivtyDiscussion09
and give me your feed back to the overall structure and organization and
if u think that it will work for us this way and also about my interface
proposals.
Kind regards
Thomas Menzel @ brox IT-Solutions GmbH
From: smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas Menzel
Sent: Freitag, 2. Oktober 2009 11:09
To: Smila project developer mailing list
Subject: RE: [smila-dev] wiki : proposal to seperate open/WIP concepts
andimplemented ones
at
least i'm not the only one
could
i get the input (ie a +1) of one of the PLs for this too?
how
are we going to edit this area then, as i'm willing to create the framework
pages but not move and update all those pages that are affected.
From: smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andreas.Weber@xxxxxxxxxxx
[Andreas.Weber@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 10:58 AM
To: smila-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: AW: [smila-dev] wiki : proposal to seperate open/WIP concepts
andimplemented ones
+1
This
„Project concepts and specifications“ section confuses me each time...
Von:
smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im
Auftrag von Thomas Menzel
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. September 2009 13:34
An: Smila project developer mailing list
Betreff: [smila-dev] wiki : proposal to seperate open/WIP concepts
andimplemented ones
hi,
i just marked the page http://wiki.eclipse.org/SMILA/Project_Concepts/Blackboard_Service_Restructured
as being implemented to make its state more known for people like me that
wander on the page and get confused: hm, this is very similar to the doc? is
this old?
this note is a help but to make this even
easier I suggest to open a page that holds all concepts/change ideas that are
·
completed
·
open/WIP/in discussion
·
rejected
I also think it is good practice to always
link the pages to bug ids and their location in SVN.
what do u think?
an even more far reaching recfactoring of
the wiki is to say:
- concepts are 10.000 ft high view of
things w/o detail to implementation ( IMO this is I guess how most people will
understand this wiki area) and I think some of those page are just that.
- I then I also would create another page
"Change and Enhancements Drafts" to hold pages such as my Resequencer
and the BBS Restructured page.
plz share your thoughts.
Kind regards
Thomas Menzel @ brox IT-Solutions GmbH
No virus
found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.420 / Virus Database: 270.14.4/2417 - Release Date: 10/07/09
05:18:00
No virus
found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.421 / Virus Database: 270.14.15/2434 - Release Date: 10/13/09
19:11:00