[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [smila-dev] State Legal Documentation
|
sonya is currently preparing list of file types and how feasible it is to add a (c) notice and ask eclipse legal on necessity.
Kind regards
Thomas Menzel @ brox IT-Solutions GmbH
-----Original Message-----
From: smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ivan Churkin
Sent: Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2008 14:11
To: Smila project developer mailing list
Subject: Re: [smila-dev] State Legal Documentation
seriously: of course processing... :(
bwt: is it required for files
.checkstyle
.classpath
.project
build.properties
?
Thomas Menzel wrote:
> would u care to turn the knife and pull it out too? ¦†
>
> seriously: I understand that this not the greatest work but if others don’t do it right doenst help us either unless we get official statement that this is not so important.
>
> Kind regards
> Thomas Menzel @ brox IT-Solutions GmbH
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ivan Churkin
> Sent: Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2008 13:34
> To: Smila project developer mailing list
> Subject: Re: [smila-dev] State Legal Documentation
>
> And .... the final cut
> In the eclipse root, property files ".eclipseproduct" and "eclipse.ini"
> does not contain license headers :D
>
> Ivan Churkin wrote:
>
>>> Write in which, I ask.. Following eclipse legal docu it is incorrect.
>>>
>> HUSH!!!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> many of them does not contain legal info in "plugin.properties" file
>> other contain
>> javax.xml.rpc_1.1.0.v200806030420
>> javax.xml.soap_1.2.0.v200806030421
>> org.apache.axis_1.4.0.v200807230600
>> org.apache.commons.discovery_0.2.0.v200806030120
>> com.ibm.icu.base.source_3.8.1.v20080530.jar
>> com.ibm.icu.source_3.8.1.v20080530.jar
>> javax.activation_1.1.0.v200806101325.jar
>> javax.jws_2.0.0.v200806110623.jar
>> javax.mail_1.4.0.v200804091730.jar
>> javax.servlet.jsp.source_2.0.0.v200806031607.jar
>> javax.servlet.jsp_2.0.0.v200806031607.jar
>> javax.servlet.source_2.4.0.v200806031604.jar
>> javax.servlet.source_2.5.0.v200806031605.jar
>> javax.servlet_2.4.0.v200806031604.jar
>> javax.servlet_2.5.0.v200806031605.jar
>> javax.wsdl.source_1.6.2.v200806030405.jar
>> and so on
>>
>> the same with "plugin.xml" file
>> a 10% of plug-ins contain legal info inside, other are not
>>
>>
>> even in main Eclipse distribution
>> org.eclipse.jdt.apt.core_3.3.1.R33x_v20071112-2330.jar/
>> .options - property file without license
>> plugin.xml - without license
>>
>>
>> org.eclipse.pde.core_3.3.2.v20071121-0800.jar
>> macosx/Info.plist - XML file without legal info
>> macosx/Info.plist.32 - XML file without legal info
>> targets/rcp.target- XML file without legal info
>> targets/rcpWithSource.target - XML file without legal info
>>
>> and so on
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sofya Zhbankova wrote:
>>
>>> Write in which, I ask.. Following eclipse legal docu it is incorrect.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> [mailto:smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ivan Churkin
>>> Sent: 2 октября 2008 г. 12:45
>>> To: Smila project developer mailing list
>>> Subject: Re: [smila-dev] State Legal Documentation
>>>
>>> :-)
>>>
>>> Seriously, I introspected Orbit bundles, and did not find license
>>> headers in a half of property files.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sofya Zhbankova wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> It will be ours now how :)
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> [mailto:smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ivan Churkin
>>>> Sent: 2 октября 2008 г. 12:30
>>>> To: Smila project developer mailing list
>>>> Subject: Re: [smila-dev] State Legal Documentation
>>>>
>>>> And, bwt, what about "about.html" why it's without license header
>>>> inside?-)
>>>>
>>>> Ivan Churkin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>> Its interesting for me,
>>>>> Is it really required by Eclipse to add copyright to XML files and
>>>>> to property files - it's only configuration files
>>>>> imho, it should be allowed to change without any copyright
>>>>> restrictions.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ivan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sofya Zhbankova wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is a little statistics: at the moment SMILA has
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Java files – 1101; without Copyright – 239
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Xml files – 219; without Copyright – 136
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Properties files – 147; without Copyright – 133
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please put it in order, insert Copyright info in all files your
>>>>>> bundles. Or write please to me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have written the small program and I can automatically insert
>>>>>> copyright into all java, properties and xml files.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As to xml files, as well as suggested Marius, the program puts
>>>>>> copyright in a bottom of a file.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sonya
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Sofya Zhbankova*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *brox *IT-Solutions GmbH*
>>>>>> *An der Breiten Wiese 9
>>>>>> 30625 HANNOVER (Germany)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> eFax: +49 (5 11) 33 65 28 – 98 78
>>>>>> Fax: +49 (5 11) 33 65 28 – 29
>>>>>> Mail: szhbankova@xxxxxxx <mailto:tmenzel@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Web: www.brox.de <http://www.brox.de/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> smila-dev mailing list
>>>>>> smila-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/smila-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> smila-dev mailing list
>>>>> smila-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/smila-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> smila-dev mailing list
>>>> smila-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/smila-dev
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> smila-dev mailing list
>>>> smila-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/smila-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> smila-dev mailing list
>>> smila-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/smila-dev
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> smila-dev mailing list
>>> smila-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/smila-dev
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> smila-dev mailing list
>> smila-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/smila-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> smila-dev mailing list
> smila-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/smila-dev
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> smila-dev mailing list
> smila-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/smila-dev
>
_______________________________________________
smila-dev mailing list
smila-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/smila-dev