[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [smila-dev] Distribution DBXML

Hi

I completely agree with Jürgen. It's much better to have universal interfaces with ability to plug-in parts (arbitrary XML database here).
Unfortunately it will be double-work here for supporting and CQ Xindice and Berkley here. Guess it's a question for PMs.


--
Ivan

Juergen.Schumacher@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Sure. But I'm not proposing to completely replace Berkeley DB by Xindice in big projects.
The idea was just to include it to be able to provide a SMILA distribution for demos that works out of the box if we cannot include Berkeley DB in an Eclipse download. For big projects it should still be possible to replace Xindice by a more performance DB (i.e. Berkeley), and the bundles for this could be downloaded from another source.

Cheers,
Jürgen.

-----Original Message-----
From: smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:smila-dev-
bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dmitry Hazin
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 10:33 AM
To: Smila project developer mailing list
Subject: Re: [smila-dev] Distribution DBXML

I think that Berkeley dbxml is more popular and better supported that
Xindice.. are there any known cases of using Xindice in big projects?
If binary libraries are problem itself, I think we could require to
install berkeley dbxml separately (at lease for the initial version),
anyway we still need java interface for these libraries (probably can
be
installed separately too)


Juergen.Schumacher@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi,

There is an XML database by Apache named Xindice,
http://xml.apache.org/xindice/index.html. The lib directory
of the download looks quite harmless. Could it work as an
replacement? Maybe somebody can have a look at this who knows which
features are needed.

Cheers,
Jürgen.


-----Original Message-----
From: smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:smila-dev-
bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sebastian Voigt
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 10:13 AM
To: smila-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [smila-dev] Distribution DBXML

We got new feedback for the CQ for our DBXML Bundles.

What do you think, what we should do,

We can separate it from our main distribution but smila need a xml
database...


See the comment from the CQ:


http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2574


Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

What |Removed |Added
-------------------------------------------------------------------
--
-------

                 CC|                            |wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx




--- Comment #12 from Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-12

11:02:58 ---

Hi Sebastian. This contribution is very large and will quite
possibly
take on

the order of a month and half for the IP team to do the review
that's
required.

How do you intend to use this code? Are you planning to wrap it
into
a Equinox

bundle and distribute it that way? Or is this something that the
user
will be

required to install separately?


-- Configure CQmail:

http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the CQ.

Sebastian

_______________________________________________
smila-dev mailing list
smila-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/smila-dev

_______________________________________________
smila-dev mailing list
smila-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/smila-dev

_______________________________________________
smila-dev mailing list
smila-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/smila-dev
_______________________________________________
smila-dev mailing list
smila-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/smila-dev