| Re: [science-iwg] Eclipse vs. Netbeans and IntelliJ |
Werner
Send science-iwg mailing list submissions to
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
science-iwg-request@eclipse.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
science-iwg-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of science-iwg digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Eclipse vs. Netbeans and IntelliJ (Matt.Gerring@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
2. Re: Eclipse vs. Netbeans and IntelliJ (Torkild Ulv?y Resheim)
------------------------------------------------------------ ----------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 12:04:18 +0000
From: <Matt.Gerring@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [science-iwg] Eclipse vs. Netbeans and IntelliJ
Message-ID: <14159819E27EDC41968035052B165F 66A03213BF@exchmbx01>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hello,
Look at this: http://www.javaworld.com/article/3114167/development- tools/choosing-your-java-ide. html
"Whereas Eclipse's plugin ecosystem once made it the top choice for developers, today it has become unwieldy and somewhat poorly maintained."
Comes bottom behind the other two big ones.
Matt
--
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail.
Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd.
Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message.
Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/science-iwg/ >attachments/20170126/a7f46c4a/ attachment.html
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 13:17:06 +0100
From: Torkild Ulv?y Resheim <torkildr@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Science Industry Working Group <science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [science-iwg] Eclipse vs. Netbeans and IntelliJ
Message-ID: <54C39AA8-FEFF-40C6-BAB1-E65C55ED17EC@xxxxxxxxx >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hi Matt,
I would argue that there are many other important aspects that makes Eclipse JDT superior to the others, especially with regards to my type of projects, which IDEA is unable to handle. But I?ll let that rest.
I think ?unwieldy and somewhat poorly maintained? is something a lot of us have been thinking for at least the past few years. But is it still true? I see a lot of positive changes and many improvements being done to the Platform and JDT. It will just take some time before the outside world perception is changed.
Best regards,
Torkild
> 26. jan. 2017 kl. 13.04 skrev <Matt.Gerring@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Matt.Gerring@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Hello,
>
> Look at this: http://www.javaworld.com/article/3114167/development- tools/choosing-your-java-ide. html
>
> ?Whereas Eclipse's plugin ecosystem once made it the top choice for developers, today it has become unwieldy and somewhat poorly maintained.?
>
> Comes bottom behind the other two big ones.
>
> Matt
>
> --
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail.
> Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd.
> Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message.
> Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> science-iwg mailing list
> science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
--
Consultant & Senior Software Developer @ Itema AS - http://itema.no
Eclipse Science PMC / Eclipse Committer
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
End of science-iwg Digest, Vol 48, Issue 7
******************************************