Yes, our development target should be Neon. If a project can't ship
on Neon, it can still be a part of the Science 2016 Q3 Release.
I like the idea of something that begins with an A, but I'm
concerned that using an element for the science release will cause
unnecessary confusion.
_Christopher
On 4/2/16 7:30 AM, Jay Jay Billings
wrote:
Actually, I was meaning that our development target should
be on Neon not Mars as Philip brought up.
But, now that you mention it, I was going to suggest that we
call our Q3 release Argon since it is the next noble gas after
Neon. "Just a stable... just bigger!" ;-)
Figured that might be a little too nerdy, even for this
crowd.
Jay
_______________________________________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
--
Christopher Brooks, PMP University of California
Academic Program Manager & Software Engineer US Mail: 337 Cory Hall
CHESS/iCyPhy/Ptolemy/TerraSwarm Berkeley, CA 94720-1774
cxh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 707.332.0670 (Office: 545Q Cory)
|