Re: [rt-pmc] Clarification needed urgently for CQ's regarding Eclipse Ve

[Julien Viet <julien@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

we added this works-with CQ for “internal dependencies”, i.e projects Vert.x uses for annotation checking and doc generation:

https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi

can you include it in 3.3 release please ?

thanks


> On May 30, 2016, at 2:40 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hi emo-ip-team,
> 
> (cc'ed Julien, Eclipse vert.x team lead and rt-pmc since this affects them directly).
> 
> Red Hat requests to have a prioritised up the CQ's for Eclipse Vert.x 3.3 release, preferably by end of this week and absolutely on June 8th in preparation for release review.
> 
> The list are as follows:
> 
> - Netty 4.1.0.CR7 -> 4.1.0.Final         : https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11509
> - Jackson Core 2.7.3 -> 2.7.4        : https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11511
> - Jackson Databind 2.7.3 -> 2.7.4    : https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11512
> - Jackson  2.7.3 -> 2.7.4 : https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11513
> - Netty Tcnative 1.1.33.Fork15 -> 1.1.33.Fork17 works-with : https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11514
> 
> Notice, you might find our dates too aggressive, but as you will notice all of these dependencies are pure service releases (x.y.* change only) which should actually not require any review thus we believe this should be trivially fulfilled.
> 
> Background:
> Last year at the board meeting 2015-06-22 (minutes here: https://eclipse.org/org/foundation/boardminutes/2015_06_22_Minutes.pdf) the following resolution:
> 
> "RESOLVED, that  previously  approved  dependencies  of  Eclipse  projects  can  be
> reviewed and approved by the EMO as follows:
> a) Service releases (e.g. x.y.*, bug fixes, security fixes) will require no review.
> b) Minor revisions (e.g. x.*.*) will require a reduced review by the EMO.
> c) Major revisions (e.g. *.*.*) will require a full review by the EMO."
> 
> The upcoming release for Eclipse Vert.x 3.3 core only have service update to its dependencies.
> Red Hat urgently request immediate approval of these CQ's.
> 
> If that is not possible then please provide information on how we otherwise should interpret that resolution made on the board close to a year ago.
> 
> Thank you,
> /max
> http://about.me/maxandersen
> _______________________________________________
> rt-pmc mailing list
> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc