[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [rt-pmc] Vert.x 3.3 upcoming release stuck
|
2 months, that’s what I call agile.
> On May 27, 2016, at 4:30 PM, Gunnar Wagenknecht <gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From my experience, it's just a long queue. Thus, I try to have all CQs in around January/March timeframe for the annual June release. Two weeks is nothing for a CQ. Two months is a more realistic processing time.
>
> However, I do think there are changes being discussed. For example, with the ton of new IoT project coming to the Foundation I see a queue overload if *every* project has to submit their CQs.
>
> -Gunnar
>
> --
> Gunnar Wagenknecht
> gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://guw.io/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> On 27 May 2016, at 00:47, Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi rt-pmc,
>>
>> I would like to second Juliens concerns here. We've been submitting these IP reviews and I know the pmc have been diligent giving +1's but we keep getting stuck or stalled in the IP reviews.
>>
>> I'll do what I can to get IP team's attention, but I'm wondering how other components in the rt project handles this ? Are you just not updating or adding dependencies to your projects ?
>>
>> Asking since I would like to understand if vert.x is in unique situation or if I can bring other examples to the IP team to underline the importance of getting these things answered in a more timely manner.
>>
>> (btw. we are working on a proposal with the IP board on something that will most likely make this problem go away completely or almost completely - but until then we still need to actually get releases out.)
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Max
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> we are going to release Vert.x 3.3 soon (a couple of weeks from now) and I we haven’t yet submitted yet the IPLog nor done the release review.
>>
>> The Netty 4.1.0.CR7 CQ has been submitted weeks ago (https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11259) . Besides Netty 4.1.0.Final was released yesterday. I have no idea of the status of this CQ that has been submitted for ages (why?)
>>
>> There is also a CQ for works-with dependencies that is unclear that it is cleared (https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11379).
>>
>> So I haven’t been able to submit an IPLog because of this missing part.
>>
>> The release review is supposed to happen this week I think (last of may), but it is hard to know because I can’t find anymore such information on the website (why?)
>>
>> Anyway it would be awesome if we can move forward on this for the 3.3 release.
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> Julien
>> rt-pmc mailing list
>> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
>>
>> /max
>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rt-pmc mailing list
>> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-pmc mailing list
> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
