I consider one +1 sufficient.
Unless the PMC decides that more than one is required (which would
necessarily complicate my life, so I'd rather not).
Wayne
On 04/06/15 12:33 PM, Scott Lewis
wrote:
I'm not sure if a second PMC +1 is
required these days...if not please ignore...but if a second is
needed will another PMC member please +1?
Thanks,
Scott
On 5/29/2015 3:00 PM, Thomas Watson wrote:
+1 for the ECF 3.10
release.
Tom
From: Scott Lewis <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 05/29/2015 04:48 PM
Subject:
Re: [rt-pmc] Equinox
4.5 (Mars) release review
Sent by:
rt-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
On 5/29/2015 2:40 PM, Thomas Watson wrote:
Please review the Equinox 4.5
(Mars) release review material [1] also respond whether you
approve or decline the review (needed by the EMO) by June 3,
So that is only Riena and Equinox that have started the review
doc process for the Mars release. Is there any other project
that needs reviews done for Mars?
Yes. ECF is having a minor release (3.10.0) [1]. In terms
of OSGi standards support (support for RSA 1.1), 3.10 is the
same as 3.9 [2], so see [2] for that part of the description.
Scott
[1] https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/rt.ecf/releases/3.10.0
[2] https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/rt.ecf/releases/3.9.0
_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation
|
