OK…thats the part where I have no idea :-). Wayne could step in, but I
also remember that Jetty does the same thing.
Maybe someone from Jetty like Jesse McConnell can say something ?
christian
Am 09.09.14 16:30 schrieb "Scott Lewis" unter <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On 9/9/2014 12:22 AM, Christian Campo wrote:
I am not an expert in IP stuff but isnt that the „natural“ thing to
submit
a CQ for Smack version 4.x and then once that is approved, include it. I
think I am missing a point because that sounds so obvious. (but dont
have
to have a new CQ for each and every new version of any 3rd party lib ?)
Are you asking whether you can pull the Smack API from Maven Central in
your build process ? (I have no idea if that is the question)
Yeah, of course a CQ will be created for version 4. But since it's not
in Orbit, how is it consumed...in build and upon deploy? The bug
author has expressed that they would like us to pull the OSGi bundle
>from Maven Central. Does any other rt project do this now for any
bundle? If so, what was involved in terms of IP approval?
Scott
_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
-------------------------------------------------------------
compeople AG
Untermainanlage 8
60329 Frankfurt/Main
fon: +49 (0) 69 / 27 22 18 0
fax: +49 (0) 69 / 27 22 18 22
web: www.compeople.de
Vorstand: Jürgen Wiesmaier
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Christian Glanz
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt/Main
Handelsregister Frankfurt HRB 56759
USt-IdNr. DE207665352
-------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc