+1 on both counts
On 27/07/2012 3:54 PM, Thomas Watson wrote:
I think Ian would make a fine
representative to the Planning Council so I second this
nomination and give my +1. I don't think it is strictly
required that the planning representative be a PMC member ...
but
I also think Ian would make a
great addition to the PMC. Each RT project gets to nominate
at least one member to the PMC. In the past we have had
multiple representatives from the same project. For example,
Jeff and myself both represented Equinox and were both on the
PMC.
I think Ian's expertise in p2
would benefit the PMC. I have worked with Ian for many
releases and I am sure he would make a great addition to the
PMC. With that I also nominate Ian to become a PMC member.
We should get a planning representative selected for the
first Kepler planning council call on August 1st. Please
voice your opinion (vote) for Ian as planning council rep and
for PMC membership.
Thanks.
Tom
Ian Bull ---07/27/2012 11:14:33
AM---While I'm not actually on the PMC, I'ld like to throw my
hat in the ring for the position of RT Planning Council
representative
While I'm not actually on the PMC,
I'ld like to throw my hat in the ring for the position of RT
Planning Council representative. I'd be happy to join the PMC
calls to provide an update (assuming they are still at 06:30 PST
for 1/2 hour). Also, if you think it's valuable, I could also
join the PMC as p2 co-lead (even though p2 is not actually a
separate project) -- I'm not sure what the rules are there.
Cheers,
Ian
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 7:45 AM,
Thomas Watson <tjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
--
R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484
http://eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
|