Re: [rt-pmc] Gemini Subprojects

[Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx>]

imo the project infrastructure should support this approach as _one_
IP log is not always best for a project

in fact for clarity sake it would be nice if we could have 2 logs for
jetty moving forward, one for jetty 7 and 8 and another for jetty 9

so imo we should push the requirement up to wayne and see if it can be
addressed at the emo level

the way this project is getting split up like this seems very artificial :/

jesse

--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx


On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 05:20, Glyn Normington <gnormington@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> At the last RT PMC call there was discussion of Gemini's subproject
> structure. Recently, one of the subprojects temporarily had no committers
> and the thought was expressed on the call that this could perhaps be avoided
> in future by amalgamating the Gemini subproject committers into a single
> ACL. Presumably this would require amalgamating the subprojects into one.
>
> I spoke to Mike Keith about this and it seems that it is necessary to keep
> the subproject structure so that individual subprojects can be released
> independently of each other (which is essential). For example, the
> subproject structure enables IP logs to be managed and approved separately.
>
> So is the conclusion that we can't amalgamate the ACLs without losing the
> ability to release subprojects independently of each other?
>
> Regards,
> Glyn
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-pmc mailing list
> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
>