Re: [rt-pmc] Access to OSGi TCKs

[Glyn Normington <gnormington@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Excellent! Thanks Wayne.

Regards,
Glyn

On 13 Jul 2011, at 19:44, Wayne Beaton wrote:

> The short answer is yes.
> 
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/TCK_Access
> 
> We have access to the OSGi TCK CTs. A PL needs to contact EMO to arrange
> access.
> 
> We are still waiting on Oracle lawyers regarding access to the Java EE TCKs.
> 
> Wayne
> 
> On 07/13/2011 10:00 AM, Glyn Normington wrote:
>> Hi Wayne
>> 
>> Any progress on this?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Glyn
>> 
>> On 2 Feb 2011, at 23:27, Wayne Beaton wrote:
>> 
>>> Greetings folks.
>>> 
>>> I apologise for the time that this process is taking. It's long past
>>> time to give you a status update.
>>> 
>>> The EF has drafted a process document for managing access by project
>>> committers to TCKs. Further, we have started implementing the
>>> infrastructure changes that we need to manage this.
>>> 
>>> Your comments are welcome.
>>> 
>>> Some key points:
>>> 
>>> A project lead needs to request access to a TCK for their project. As
>>> part of that request, the project needs to specify the project
>>> committers who need access to the TCK. Project leads can subsequently
>>> request that other committers be granted access to the TCK. My current
>>> thinking is to manage these requests through Bugzilla (Community/TCK
>>> Access).
>>> 
>>> The PMC will be asked to approve access to the TCK for the project.
>>> 
>>> The EMO will require that designated committers sign an agreement. Janet
>>> is currently working on that agreement. This will be done through direct
>>> contact by the Legal team.
>>> 
>>> A single mailing list will be created for each TCK. Only those
>>> committers with access to the TCK will have access to the mailing list.
>>> This will allow committers from different projects to share information.
>>> 
>>> Similarly, committers with access to the TCK will be granted access to a
>>> closed Bugzilla instance. Webmaster is working out the details of what
>>> this will look like.
>>> 
>>> My intent is to get ECF moving on the OSGi RSA TCK as quickly as
>>> possible. We'll handle this first experience without the benefit of
>>> complete infrastructure; I'm hoping to use that experience to flesh out
>>> any important details that we've missed so that we can revise our
>>> infrastructure development plans. Basically, as soon as we have the
>>> legal agreements sorted out, we should be good-to-go with access to the
>>> TCK and a mailing list.
>>> 
>>> We're concerned that there are a lot of moving parts here, so we hope to
>>> have the required infrastructure in place before we commit to any other
>>> TCK access.
>>> 
>>> I hope that this makes sense.
>>> 
>>> Wayne
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rt-pmc mailing list
>>> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
>> _______________________________________________
>> rt-pmc mailing list
>> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
> 
> -- 
> Wayne Beaton
> The Eclipse Foundation
> Twitter: @waynebeaton
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rt-pmc mailing list
> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc