Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [rt-pmc] PMC call participation

I can only attend for 30 minutes at that time. So if we agree to keep the meetings short that would work for me ;-)

Tom



Inactive hide details for Jeff McAffer ---05/04/2011 12:37:58 PM---that is fine with me.Jeff McAffer ---05/04/2011 12:37:58 PM---that is fine with me.


From:

Jeff McAffer <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

To:

Runtime Project PMC mailing list <rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:

05/04/2011 12:37 PM

Subject:

Re: [rt-pmc] PMC call participation




that is fine with me.  

Jeff


On 2011-05-04, at 1:35 PM, douglas clarke wrote:

> Can we split the difference and do 9:30 AM on Wednesday?
>
> On 04/05/2011 1:29 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
>> well they can move that meeting for us, RT is the fundamentals of
>> eclipse anyway so we ought to be deferred to :)
>>
>> j/k
>>
>> jesse
>>
>> --
>> jesse mcconnell
>> jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:26, Jeff McAffer<jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>>> I have the Eclipse PMC meeting every Wed at 1030ET.
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>>
>>> On 2011-05-04, at 12:56 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
>>>
>>>> i am fine with moving it back an hour but it makes it later for the
>>>> european folks to attend
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>> jesse
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> jesse mcconnell
>>>> jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:43, douglas clarke<douglas.clarke@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>>>>> I would like to attend every call as well and do my best to get a
>>>>> replacement when one is available.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wednesday morning at 9 AM does not generally work for me so changing the day
>>>>> or slipping the call later by an hour would help me make it more.
>>>>>
>>>>> Doug
>>>>>
>>>>> On 04/05/2011 12:41 PM, Jeff McAffer wrote:
>>>>>> The last few PMC calls have been pretty sparsely attended.  Not sure if
>>>>>> everyone is just busy or what but it is hard to have some of these cross
>>>>>> project discussions (e.g., release train participation and RTP enterprise
>>>>>> packages) without representation from some of the key points on the
>>>>>> spectrum. Its also a disservice to the other members who do show up only to
>>>>>> have curtailed or repeated conversations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Obviously ti would be best if the same project rep showed up for every
>>>>>> meeting.  Realistically, people are busy.  In the event that you are not
>>>>>> going to be able to make a PMC call, please ensure that someone from the
>>>>>> project shows up and is aware of the topics/context at hand.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any other thoughts on how we can improve the situation?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jeff
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> rt-pmc mailing list
>>>>>> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> rt-pmc mailing list
>>>>> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rt-pmc mailing list
>>>> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rt-pmc mailing list
>>> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rt-pmc mailing list
>> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
> _______________________________________________
> rt-pmc mailing list
> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc

_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc


GIF image

GIF image


Back to the top