Re: [rt-pmc] PMC call participation

[Jeff McAffer <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

that is fine with me.  

Jeff


On 2011-05-04, at 1:35 PM, douglas clarke wrote:

> Can we split the difference and do 9:30 AM on Wednesday?
> 
> On 04/05/2011 1:29 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
>> well they can move that meeting for us, RT is the fundamentals of
>> eclipse anyway so we ought to be deferred to :)
>> 
>> j/k
>> 
>> jesse
>> 
>> --
>> jesse mcconnell
>> jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:26, Jeff McAffer<jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>>> I have the Eclipse PMC meeting every Wed at 1030ET.
>>> 
>>> Jeff
>>> 
>>> On 2011-05-04, at 12:56 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
>>> 
>>>> i am fine with moving it back an hour but it makes it later for the
>>>> european folks to attend
>>>> 
>>>> cheers,
>>>> jesse
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> jesse mcconnell
>>>> jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:43, douglas clarke<douglas.clarke@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>>>>> I would like to attend every call as well and do my best to get a
>>>>> replacement when one is available.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Wednesday morning at 9 AM does not generally work for me so changing the day
>>>>> or slipping the call later by an hour would help me make it more.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Doug
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 04/05/2011 12:41 PM, Jeff McAffer wrote:
>>>>>> The last few PMC calls have been pretty sparsely attended.  Not sure if
>>>>>> everyone is just busy or what but it is hard to have some of these cross
>>>>>> project discussions (e.g., release train participation and RTP enterprise
>>>>>> packages) without representation from some of the key points on the
>>>>>> spectrum. Its also a disservice to the other members who do show up only to
>>>>>> have curtailed or repeated conversations.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Obviously ti would be best if the same project rep showed up for every
>>>>>> meeting.  Realistically, people are busy.  In the event that you are not
>>>>>> going to be able to make a PMC call, please ensure that someone from the
>>>>>> project shows up and is aware of the topics/context at hand.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Any other thoughts on how we can improve the situation?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Jeff
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> rt-pmc mailing list
>>>>>> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> rt-pmc mailing list
>>>>> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
>>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rt-pmc mailing list
>>>> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rt-pmc mailing list
>>> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> rt-pmc mailing list
>> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
> _______________________________________________
> rt-pmc mailing list
> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc