Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [rt-pmc] Re: Request to grant a "workswith" CQ for jetty to use pax-exam.

I agree, this is reasonable. +1

Tom



Inactive hide details for Glyn Normington ---07/10/2010 03:49:22 AM---Seems reasonable to me, so +1.Glyn Normington ---07/10/2010 03:49:22 AM---Seems reasonable to me, so +1.


From:

Glyn Normington <gnormington@xxxxxxxxxx>

To:

Runtime Project PMC mailing list <rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:

07/10/2010 03:49 AM

Subject:

Re: [rt-pmc] Re: Request to grant a "workswith" CQ for jetty to use pax-exam.




Seems reasonable to me, so +1.

I'm not sure what the rules are for PMC decisions, but I'd like to see at least one or two more +1s to be sure there is consensus as "workwith" isn't the most clearly understood concept.

Glyn
On 10 Jul 2010, at 00:44, Hugues Malphettes wrote:

> Hi pmc-members,
> Could you let us know if we can use pax-exam as a "works-with" item?
> Thanks a lot,
> Hugues.
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Hugues Malphettes
> <hmalphettes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>> We would like to use for our integration testing of jetty a set of maven
>> plugins called "Pax Exam".
>> It is distributed here:
http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxexam/Pax+Exam
>> A typical usecase is documented
>> here:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=316560
>> Please let us know if the corresponding CQ (CQ-4284) should be granted the
>> status "workswith".
>> Thanks!
>> Hugues.
> _______________________________________________
> rt-pmc mailing list
> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc

_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc


GIF image

GIF image


Back to the top