This appears to be a bug in the tool. Wayne of David, do you know?
Tom
Inactive hide details for Joakim Erdfelt ---06/07/2010 01:03:34
PM---According to the grid at http://eclipse.org/helios/planninJoakim
Erdfelt ---06/07/2010 01:03:34 PM---According to the grid at
http://eclipse.org/helios/planning/SimultaneousReleaseGrid.php?projectid=rt
From:
Joakim Erdfelt <joakim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
Runtime Project PMC mailing list <rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
06/07/2010 01:03 PM
Subject:
Re: [rt-pmc] Tracking compliance for the Helios release
------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the grid
at _http://eclipse.org/helios/planning/SimultaneousReleaseGrid.php?projectid=rt_
rt.jetty is now (mostly) in compliance.
However, the last 2 items do not appear to update correctly (IPLog and
Release Docuware)
The links found on Helios summary for rt.jetty's page show that we are
in compliance.
_http://eclipse.org/helios/planning/SimultaneousReleaseOverview.php?action=project&projectid=rt.jetty_
<http://eclipse.org/helios/planning/SimultaneousReleaseOverview.php?action=project&projectid=rt.jetty>
What's left?
- Joakim Erdfelt
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Wayne Beaton <_wayne@eclipse.org_
<mailto:wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Has the IP changed since you submitted your log on May 5 for
your 7.1 release? If not, you can use that log for Helios. But
you have to let me know that this is what you're doing.
I notice that there are no contributions indicated on the IP
Log. A quick look reveals at least one bug [1] contains a patch
that was (apparently) committed into the code repository. This
patch [2], and others like it should be marked iplog+ so that
the automatic IP Log generator can find it.
I have a script that may be helpful to identify those
bugs/patches that contain IP [3].
More information about IP Logs can be found on the wiki [4].
Note that it is *always* better to mark a patch as iplog+ rather
than the bug (more specifically... avoid marking bugs as iplog+,
as managing it is a PITA).
FWIW, you still have time to get this in, but the IP team is
working through the current submissions. Sooner is much better
than later.
HTH,
Wayne
[1] _https://bugs.eclipse.org/270534_
[2]
_https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=130329&action=edit_
<https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=130329&action=edit>
[3]
_http://eclipse.org/projects/temporary/iplog_review.php?id=rt.jetty_
[4] _http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/IP_Log_
Thomas Watson wrote:
Sorry, I gave the wrong link to submit the iplog. For jetty it
should be
_http://www.eclipse.org/projects/ip_log.php?projectid=rt.jetty_
Tom
Inactive hide details for Thomas Watson---06/02/2010 04:04:09
PM---Thanks for getting this together in Jesse's absence.Thomas
Watson---06/02/2010 04:04:09 PM---Thanks for getting this
together in Jesse's absence.
From:
Thomas Watson/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
To:
Runtime Project PMC mailing list <_rt-pmc@eclipse.org_
<mailto:rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date:
06/02/2010 04:04 PM
Subject:
Re: [rt-pmc] Tracking compliance for the Helios release
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for getting this together in Jesse's absence.
+1 to the slides with one modification, the planned review date
is June 23, 2010. The first slide states 12/05/2010.
Do you know if the iplog has been officially submitted to the
emo? According to
__http://eclipse.org/helios/planning/SimultaneousReleaseGrid.php?projectid=rt__
the IP Log has not been sent yet. A committer from jetty needs
to go to
__http://www.eclipse.org/projects/ip_log_submit_to_legal.php?projectid=rt.jetty__
and review the content and then hit the submit button at the
bottom of that page.
Tom
Inactive hide details for Joakim Erdfelt ---06/02/2010 03:49:20
PM---Just a quick reply (filling in for Jesse while he's out).
Joakim Erdfelt ---06/02/2010 03:49:20 PM---Just a quick reply
(filling in for Jesse while he's out). Here are Jetty 7.1
release slides I think you wanted -->
From:
Joakim Erdfelt <_joakim@webtide.com_ <mailto:joakim@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
To:
Runtime Project PMC mailing list <_rt-pmc@eclipse.org_
<mailto:rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date:
06/02/2010 03:49 PM
Subject:
Re: [rt-pmc] Tracking compliance for the Helios release
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just a quick reply (filling in for Jesse while he's out).
Here are Jetty 7.1 release slides I think you wanted -->
__http://www.eclipse.org/project-slides/Jetty_7.1_ReleaseReview.pdf__
_
_- Joakim Erdfelt
Jetty Project Developer
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Thomas Watson
<_tjwatson@xxxxxx.com_ <mailto:_tjwatson@xxxxxx.com_
<mailto:tjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
That reminds me. Did we see slideware for the release
review from Jetty? Jesse, if not can you provide that
ASAP?
Tom
Inactive hide details for Thomas Watson---06/02/2010
11:33:03 AM---We are at the end of the development cycle
for the Helios reThomas Watson---06/02/2010 11:33:03
AM---We are at the end of the development cycle for the
Helios release. The planning council is tracking our
progress more closely n
From:
Thomas Watson/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
To: _
__rt-pmc@eclipse.org_ <mailto:_rt-pmc@eclipse.org_
<mailto:rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date:
06/02/2010 11:33 AM
Subject:
[rt-pmc] Tracking compliance for the Helios release
------------------------------------------------------------------------
We are at the end of the development cycle for the Helios
release. The planning council is tracking our progress
more closely now. Please update your tracking data soon
(see
__http://eclipse.org/helios/planning/SimultaneousReleaseGrid.php?projectid=rt__
for the RT status)
EclipseLink and Jetty have the most yellow at this point.
It should be simple to fill out the necessary information
in the eclipse portal to get a green status. Let me know
if you have any questions. Thanks.
Tom
_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list_
__rt-pmc@eclipse.org_ <mailto:_rt-pmc@eclipse.org_
<mailto:rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>>_
___https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc__
_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list_
__rt-pmc@eclipse.org_ <mailto:_rt-pmc@eclipse.org_
<mailto:rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>>_
___https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc__
_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@eclipse.org_
___https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc__
_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list_
__rt-pmc@eclipse.org_ <mailto:rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>_
__https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc_
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list_
__rt-pmc@eclipse.org_ <mailto:rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>_
__https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc_
--
Wayne Beaton, The Eclipse Foundation_
__http://www.eclipse.org_ <http://www.eclipse.org/>
_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list_
__rt-pmc@eclipse.org_ <mailto:rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>_
__https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc_
_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc