Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [rt-pmc] Tracking compliance for the Helios release
The last two rows will get filled in as Anne and I work through the IP Log and docuware submissions. It's taking longer than we hoped, please be patient. 

Wayne

Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
According to the grid at http://eclipse.org/helios/planning/SimultaneousReleaseGrid.php?projectid=rt 
rt.jetty is now (mostly) in compliance.
However, the last 2 items do not appear to update correctly (IPLog and Release Docuware) The links found on Helios summary for rt.jetty's page show that we are in compliance. http://eclipse.org/helios/planning/SimultaneousReleaseOverview.php?action=project&projectid=rt.jetty <http://eclipse.org/helios/planning/SimultaneousReleaseOverview.php?action=project&projectid=rt.jetty> 

What's left?

- Joakim Erdfelt
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: 

    Has the IP changed since you submitted your log on May 5 for your
    7.1 release? If not, you can use that log for Helios. But you have
    to let me know that this is what you're doing.

    I notice that there are no contributions indicated on the IP Log.
    A quick look reveals at least one bug [1] contains a patch that
    was (apparently) committed into the code repository. This patch
    [2], and others like it should be marked iplog+ so that the
    automatic IP Log generator can find it.

    I have a script that may be helpful to identify those bugs/patches
    that contain IP [3].

    More information about IP Logs can be found on the wiki [4]. Note
    that it is *always* better to mark a patch as iplog+ rather than
    the bug (more specifically... avoid marking bugs as iplog+, as
    managing it is a PITA).

    FWIW, you still have time to get this in, but the IP team is
    working through the current submissions. Sooner is much better
    than later.

    HTH,

    Wayne

    [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/270534
    [2]
    https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=130329&action=edit
    <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=130329&action=edit>
    [3] http://eclipse.org/projects/temporary/iplog_review.php?id=rt.jetty
    [4] http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/IP_Log

    Thomas Watson wrote:


        Sorry, I gave the wrong link to submit the iplog. For jetty it
        should be
        http://www.eclipse.org/projects/ip_log.php?projectid=rt.jetty

        Tom



        Inactive hide details for Thomas Watson---06/02/2010 04:04:09
        PM---Thanks for getting this together in Jesse's
        absence.Thomas Watson---06/02/2010 04:04:09 PM---Thanks for
        getting this together in Jesse's absence.
From: Thomas Watson/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
To: Runtime Project PMC mailing list <rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx 
        <mailto:rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: 06/02/2010 04:04 PM
Subject: Re: [rt-pmc] Tracking compliance for the Helios release 

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------



        Thanks for getting this together in Jesse's absence.

        +1 to the slides with one modification, the planned review
        date is June 23, 2010. The first slide states 12/05/2010.

        Do you know if the iplog has been officially submitted to the
        emo? According to
        _http://eclipse.org/helios/planning/SimultaneousReleaseGrid.php?projectid=rt_
        the IP Log has not been sent yet. A committer from jetty needs
        to go to
        _http://www.eclipse.org/projects/ip_log_submit_to_legal.php?projectid=rt.jetty_
        and review the content and then hit the submit button at the
        bottom of that page.

        Tom



        Inactive hide details for Joakim Erdfelt ---06/02/2010
        03:49:20 PM---Just a quick reply (filling in for Jesse while
        he's out). Joakim Erdfelt ---06/02/2010 03:49:20 PM---Just a
        quick reply (filling in for Jesse while he's out). Here are
        Jetty 7.1 release slides I think you wanted -->
From: Joakim Erdfelt <joakim@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:joakim@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
To: Runtime Project PMC mailing list <rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx 
        <mailto:rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: 06/02/2010 03:49 PM
Subject: Re: [rt-pmc] Tracking compliance for the Helios release 

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------



        Just a quick reply (filling in for Jesse while he's out).

        Here are Jetty 7.1 release slides I think you wanted -->
        _http://www.eclipse.org/project-slides/Jetty_7.1_ReleaseReview.pdf_
        _
        _- Joakim Erdfelt
        Jetty Project Developer

        On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Thomas Watson
        <_tjwatson@xxxxxx.com_ <mailto:tjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx
        <mailto:tjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:

                   That reminds me. Did we see slideware for the release
                   review from Jetty? Jesse, if not can you provide
        that ASAP?

                   Tom



                   Inactive hide details for Thomas Watson---06/02/2010
                   11:33:03 AM---We are at the end of the development
        cycle
                   for the Helios reThomas Watson---06/02/2010 11:33:03

                   AM---We are at the end of the development cycle for the
                   Helios release. The planning council is tracking our
                   progress more closely n
From: Thomas Watson/Austin/IBM@IBMUS 

        To:     _
        __rt-pmc@eclipse.org_ <mailto:rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
        <mailto:rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: 06/02/2010 11:33 AM
Subject: [rt-pmc] Tracking compliance for the Helios release
------------------------------------------------------------------------ 




                   We are at the end of the development cycle for the
        Helios
                   release. The planning council is tracking our progress
                   more closely now. Please update your tracking data soon
                   (see
_http://eclipse.org/helios/planning/SimultaneousReleaseGrid.php?projectid=rt_ 
                   for the RT status)

                   EclipseLink and Jetty have the most yellow at this
        point.
                   It should be simple to fill out the necessary
        information
                   in the eclipse portal to get a green status. Let me
        know
                   if you have any questions. Thanks.

                   Tom
                   _______________________________________________
                   rt-pmc mailing list_
                   __rt-pmc@eclipse.org_ <mailto:rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
        <mailto:rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>>_

                   __https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc_



                   _______________________________________________
                   rt-pmc mailing list_
                   __rt-pmc@eclipse.org_ <mailto:rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
        <mailto:rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>>_

                   __https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc_
        _______________________________________________
        rt-pmc mailing list
        rt-pmc@eclipse.org_
        __https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc_

        _______________________________________________
        rt-pmc mailing list
        rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
        https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc


        ------------------------------------------------------------------------

        _______________________________________________
        rt-pmc mailing list
        rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
        https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
-- Wayne Beaton, The Eclipse Foundation 
    http://www.eclipse.org


    _______________________________________________
    rt-pmc mailing list
    rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
    https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc


------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc


--
Wayne Beaton, The Eclipse Foundation
http://www.eclipse.org

Back to the top