Re: [rt-pmc] Equinox release review slides

[Thomas Watson <tjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree, I expect we will have quite a few reviews to do over the next few days and the RT PMC members should be ready to turn around the reviews quickly.

Tom



Jeff McAffer ---05/25/2010 12:59:29 PM---That's fine with me. Jeff

From:	Jeff McAffer <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:	Runtime Project PMC mailing list <rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	05/25/2010 12:59 PM
Subject:	Re: [rt-pmc] Equinox release review slides

---

That's fine with me.

Jeff 

On 2010-05-25, at 1:52 PM, Douglas Clarke wrote:

Thinking more about it... If there is any minimum number of +1 required we should avoid voting for our own projects. I believe we have enough members of this PMC to cover getting 3 +1 votes exclusive of voting for our own projects.

Doug
-----Original Message-----
From: Douglas Clarke
Sent: May 25, 2010 1:42 PM
To: Runtime Project PMC mailing list
Subject: RE: [rt-pmc] Equinox release review slides

I thought release review slides was just one +1. My mistake

Doug
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff McAffer [mailto:jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: May 25, 2010 1:31 PM
To: Runtime Project PMC mailing list
Subject: Re: [rt-pmc] Equinox release review slides

Good point Doug. This is a case where we vote not unilaterally approve. I believe that all PMC members should be allowed (encouraged) to vote. As with any vote at Eclipse, it will pass if there are substantial +1s and no -1s. Here I suspect that 3 +1s (the norm) should work. That ensures that even if both co-leads of a project vote +1 there is still at least one other PMC member. Seems reasonable?

Jeff




On 2010-05-25, at 1:17 PM, Douglas Clarke wrote:

Tom (Equinox project co-lead) submits slides ... Jeff (Equinox co-lead) gives PMC +1

I thought we were not supposed to +1 our own stuff?

Doug
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff McAffer [mailto:jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: May 25, 2010 1:00 PM
To: Runtime Project PMC mailing list
Subject: Re: [rt-pmc] Equinox release review slides

+1 for the Equinox slides

Jeff



On 2010-05-25, at 12:27 PM, Thomas Watson wrote:

It is that time of year again.

Attached is a draft of the Equinox release review slides for the Helios release (due Friday, May 28th).The RT projects participating in the Helios release need to prepare the release review slideware and get it approved by the RT-PMC. Please review and give your +1s.

Tom

(See attached file: Equinox Project 3.6Release Review.ppt)(See attached file: Equinox Project 3.6Release Review.pdf)

<Equinox Project 3.6Release Review.ppt><Equinox Project 3.6Release Review.pdf>_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc

_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc

_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc